297 Assessing continence care in a rehabilitation unit: insights from an audit

Abstract

Abstract Background Urinary incontinence, a prevalent condition and one of the original geriatric giants, remains a taboo topic and is frequently underreported. Urinary incontinence significantly impacts patients and often times their discharge destination. However, urinary incontinence is neither inevitable nor always irreversible. This audit aimed to assess continence and incontinence wear in a rehabilitation facility. Methods The continence care quality in a medical gerontology ward was assessed using the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) National Audit of Continence Care (NACC) standard. A prospective audit was conducted over a five-day period, documenting incontinence wear and urinary continence on a medical gerontology ward. Two interventions were implemented prior to re-auditing. Firstly, continence was incorporated as a teaching topic on the Non-Consultant Hospital Doctor (NCHD) teaching schedule. Secondly, the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) proforma was adjusted to include a patient-specific continence record. A snapshot re-audit was conducted to evaluate any changes resulting from these interventions. Results In the initial audit, 31 patients were included. Among them, 26 (83.9%) wore incontinence wear, with 21 (80.8%) voluntarily opting for it. Urinary incontinence was documented in 13 patients (41.9%). In the re-audit, 40 patients were included. Among them, 27 (67.5%) wore incontinence wear, with 19 (70%) choosing it. Urinary incontinence was documented in 18 patients (45.7%). Conclusion The re-audit revealed a slight decrease in incontinence wear usage (67.5% compared to 83.9% initially). Many patients wearing incontinence wear expressed a preference for it in both audit cycles. The prevalence of urinary incontinence remained similar between audits (41.9% and 45.7% respectively). The persisting prevalence of urinary incontinence calls for effective strategies to address this issue. Additionally, the patients’ preference for incontinence wear emphasises the importance of engaging not only the MDT but also the patients themselves in future interventions. Future projects should focus on gaining a deeper understanding of patients’ perspectives on continence care and evaluating the impact of incontinence on patient outcomes.