281 Impact of Using Risk Communication Tools in Counselling Patients with Newly Diagnosed Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Abstract Introduction There have been substantial advances in risk communication tools that help patients understand prognosis associated with prostate cancer and the benefit/gain from treatment. Over the last three years, two tools; Cambridge Prognostic Groups (CPG), and Predict Prostate (https://prostate.predict.nhs.uk), along with decision-making consultations with clinical nurse specialists (CNS) have been integrated into the new diagnosis pathway in our unit. Method Treatment decisions for patients with new non-metastatic prostate cancer were audited after (2019–2020) and before (2016–2017) new risk communication tools were implemented. Data were compared between the two time periods and also benchmarked against national level data from the National Prostate Cancer Audit (NPCA) (Parry et al 2020; PMID: 32460859). The main outcome measured was comparison of rates of over and under-treatment of disease. Results 168 and 95 patients were included in the 2019–2020 and 2016–2017 cohorts, respectively. Following implementation there was a reduction in over-treatment (use of radical surgery/radiotherapy) in patients with low risk/CPG1 (23% to 4%). These rates were also better than the national average from NPCA data (4% vs 11%). In parallel, there was an increase in use of radical treatment (reduced under-treatment) in high risk and very high-risk/CPG4-5 disease (84% vs 73%). Again, these rates were also superior to national level data from the NPCA (84% vs 76%). Conclusions Incorporating personalised risk-communication tools and dedicated CNS counselling in our unit has reduced over-treatment of early disease and under-treatment of advanced disease. Wider uptake could enhance risk-appropriate treatment of patients with a new prostate cancer diagnosis.