#2691 Treatment naive membranous nephropathy patients treated with rituximab in COVID19 era

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Standard of care of high-risk idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients is immunosuppressive treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids or rituximab. Our aim was to assess outcome and safety of rituximab therapy in COVID19 era in comparison to modified Ponticelli protocol. Method In this retrospective study all adult patients with biopsy proven membranous nephropathy treated with rituximab as a first line therapy from 2020 till 2022 were enrolled and compared with MN patients treated with modified Ponticelli protocol from 2013 till 2020. Renal outcome was defined as composite of partial and complete remission defined according KDIGO guidelines. Except otherwise stated, data are shown as N (%) or median with interquartile range (IQR) and accompanied p levels. Results During the COVID 19 era, between 2020 and 2022, 8 MN patients were treated with rituximab as a first line therapy. One was lost from follow up and one had allergic infusion reaction and therefore was excluded from further analysis. Ten patients were treated with modified Ponticelli protocol. There was no difference in age (60 vs. 59 years; p = 0.669), gender (M 57.1 vs. 60%), BMI (26.3 vs. 29.1cm/kg; p = 0.906), systolic (140. vs. 150 mmHg; p = 0.161) or diastolic (90 vs. 91.5 mmHg; p = 0.230) blood pressure between rituximab and cyclophosphamide treated group. Also, there was no difference in proteinuria between rituximab and cyclophosphamide treated group (16.2 (5.7–31.3) vs. 8.7 (6.5–12.5) g/dU; p = 0.201) Patients treated with cyclophosphamide had lower eGFR compared with patients treated with rituximab (51 (34-79) vs. 93 (72-98) ml/min/1,73 m²; p = 0.005). At 6 months follow up only 2 (28.6%) in rituximab group and 6 (60%) in cyclophosphamide group achieved outcome defined as composite of complete and partial remission. At one year follow up, there was no difference in outcome between groups and all patients from rituximab group compared to 8 patients (88.9%) from cyclophosphamide group accomplished composite favorable renal outcome (p = 398). At the end of follow up, one year after cyclophosphamide therapy eGFR was better (57 (43-96) vs. 51 (34-79) ml/min/1,73 m²). Rituximab was safe in our cohort. Three (50%) of patients acquired SARS CoV2 infection and there was no adverse outcome regarding COVID 19 disease. Conclusion Cyclophosphamide is faster than rituximab in accomplishing remission of nephrotic syndrome and improves deteriorated kidney function. Nevertheless, at 1 year follow up rituximab efficiency is proven to be excellent. Cyclophosphamide should be reserved for MN patients with nephrotic syndrome with reduced glomerular filtration rate.