Abstract

Purpose In this study we changed the acquisition parameters in chest X-ray of 5 years old pediatric patients in order to lower radiation dose and preserve image quality. A new acquisition technique (T2) was compared to the previous (T1). The comparison regarded dosimetric and a qualitative assessment on phantom and on patients. Methods For dose evaluation we calculated the ESD on a phantom and on patients and we used PCXMC software to evaluate the effective dose (E). We used the TO.20 Leeds Test and AutoPIA software to perform an analysis on a plexiglass phantom simulating patient with the test in between, exposing the phantom to different parameters in order to choose the best technique to use: T2 and comparing it with T1 [1] . The images were analysed from a quantitative viewpoint determining the Correct Observation Ratio% (COR%) and Normalized Correct Observation Ratio% (NCOR%) [2] in order to establish which had the maximum value. For qualitative analysis of the clinical image, radiologists examined X- ray images of patients using T1 and comparing it with T2. Results We noticed that T2 can entail a lower ESD: −68% and a lower effective dose: −65%. In relation to qualitative analysis, carried out by radiologists, there was no significant preference of one technique over another. T2 proved to be the best also in TO.20 analysis performed on a phantom: COR% is comparable: T2 (36%), T1 (39%) and NCOR% is better: T2 (6.2%), T1 (3.9%). Conclusions By optimising acquisition parameters in chest acquisition of pediatric patients, using filtration 0.1 mmCu + 1mmAl, removing grid and setting lower kV, it is possible to lower radiation dose preserving image quality.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.