#2650 A novel approach for exit site care reduces peritoneal dialysis catheter related infections

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Peritoneal dialysis (PD) related infections, including peritonitis and catheter related infections, are associated with significant morbidity and technique failure. Various exit site care protocols are available, most allow to shower in running water after the exit site is well healed. Following an increase in exit site infections (ESI) in our dialysis unit, partially resulting from water derived organisms, we implemented a novel exit site care protocol. The protocol included complete avoidance of water exposure using stoma bag during shower; and change in antibiotic treatment from gentamycin to mupirocin. We aimed to evaluate its efficacy to decrease ESI episodes. Method A prospective single center trial. Study group included PD patients between June 2018 - May 2021 who implemented the new exit-site care protocol. They were compared to a historical control group that included all PD patients between January 2016 to May 2018. In the control group, exit-site care included a daily shower with a bactericidal cleanser containing chlorhexidine 4%, thereafter local gentamycin 0.1% was applied with sterile gauze dressing. In the study group, water exposure during daily wash was avoided using a stoma bag sealed around the catheter exit-site and the tubing. Thereafter, the exit-site was cleaned with a chlorhexidine 0.5%- alcohol 70% solution and local mupirocin 2% was applied with a sterile gauze cover. Primary outcome was catheter related infections, including ESI and tunnel infection. Secondary outcomes were peritonitis and technique loss. Results A total of 113 patients were included, 58 patients in control and 55 in study group. Mean follow up time was 13.28 ± 9.5 months in control and 16.4 12.7 months in study group. ESI rate was significantly lower in study group (0.11/patient year) compared to control group (0.71/ patient year), p<0.001. Time to first ESI was significantly longer in study group, χ² (1) = 25.104, p < 0.001 (Fig. 1). On multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed the protective effect of the intervention on ESI risk (p <0.001). Longer PD vintage and active cancer predicted ESI (p = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). There were no tunnel infections during study period compared to 3 episodes during control. Peritonitis rate was significantly lower in study group (0.19/patient years) compared to control group (0.40/patient years), p=0.011. There was no difference in time to first peritonitis episode between groups χ² (1)=2.32, p=0.128. Nine patients were lost to PD due to PD related infection in control group, compared to 5 in study group. Peritonitis related mortality occurred in one patient in control group. Conclusion Protection of exit site from water exposure in conjunction with local Mupirocin cream reduced significantly ESI and peritonitis episodes in peritoneal dialysis patients. This protocol may be more beneficial in areas of poor water quality.