Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) continues to be a significant source of morbidity for surgical patients. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is indicated for DVT in patients who have contraindications to anticoagulation or failure of anticoagulation. Over the last decade, there is exponential increase of IVC filter placement with increased complications reported. These include IVC penetration, IVC occlusion, insertion complication and filter migration. We report a rare case of symptomatic duodenal perforation by an IVC filter migration. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: A 33-year-old female with a history of paraplegia secondary to motor vehicle accident, recurrent DVTs, and placement of IVC filter 10 years ago presented to the hospital for persistent epigastric pain for the past 5 years. Patient denied any nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or hematochezia. Physical exam showed epigastric tenderness. Labs including complete blood count were unremarkable. CT scan showed a longstanding IVC occlusion with collaterals and displaced IVC filter into the duodenum and into the L3 vertebral body (Figure 1). An EGD confirmed prong migration to the second portion of the duodenum (Figure 2). This was distal to the ampulla and penetrating the duodenal wall with the tip embedding the opposite wall. Due to multiple workups being otherwise negative and symptomatic duodenal perforation of the IVC filter, she has been scheduled for an open IVC filter extraction with duodenal and caval repair. DISCUSSION: Duodenal and aortic perforations by IVC filters have been increasingly reported in the past 10 years although still rare. Penetration of the filter struts through the wall of the IVC can be asymptomatic. However symptomatic patients may present with epigastric pain, gastrointestinal bleeding and small bowel obstruction. Currently, there are no guidelines for the management of such patients. Most cases have been repaired using an open repair with excellent outcomes; however, endovascular retrieval and repair is being recognized as an alternative option especially in high risk patients. This case illustrates that even though IVC migration and perforation is a rare complication, it needs to be recognized as a potential cause for gastrointestinal symptoms in these patients. Retrievable IVC filters should always be removed if possible when deemed unnecessary to prevent complications such as migration from developing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call