251. COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES WITH OR WITHOUT HAND-ASSISTED PROCEDURE IN THE ABDOMINAL PHASE OF THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY IN THE PRONE POSITION

Abstract

Abstract Laparoscopic surgery is less invasive than open surgery in the abdominal phase of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TEP). Laparoscopic surgery (LAP) and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for mobilization of the stomach and abdominal lymph node dissection have been standard procedures. We aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of those procedures in patients undergone TEP. We evaluated 69 patients who underwent TEP and received gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal cancer. The LAP group consisted of 42 patients, whereas the HALS group consisted of 27 patients. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification, grade II or higher) were evaluated between the two groups. No significant differences were found in age, sex, clinical T stage, clinical N status, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy status between the two groups. According to surgical outcomes, there were no significant differences in overall operation time and reconstruction route. Abdominal operation time was significantly shorter in HALS group than in LAP group (LAP: 157 min (73–238), HALS: 96 min (35–157), P < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in anastomotic leakage, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, pneumonia, and postoperative stay (LAP vs HALS: 19.0% vs 25.9%, P = 0.558; 2.4% vs 3.7%, P = 1.000; 16.7% vs 29.6%, P = 0.240; 31 days (16–83) vs 36 days (16–97), P = 0.301). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. HALS is a feasible procedure with short abdominal operative time for patients with esophageal cancer.