24-Hour Proteinuria Versus Spot Protein-Creatinine Ratio for Kidney Transplant Management in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background24-hour proteinuria (24h-P) has been the most widespread test for clinical follow-up of proteinuria after kidney transplantation (KT), but urine collection is often not properly collected. Spot protein-creatinine ratio (P/Cr) has become the alternative to 24h-P for proteinuria evaluation in many KT units. However, its reliability, equivalence to 24h-P, and prognostic value regarding allograft outcome remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between both methods for assessing proteinuria and to analyze which of them is a better predictor of graft survival. MethodsWe collected proteinuria measurements from KT patients in our center. 24h-P was adjusted for body surface area. Pearson correlation test and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyze correlation and agreement. Survival analysis was performed with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. ResultsA total of 8,549 urine samples were analyzed from 472 patients in whom 24h-P and P/Cr were simultaneously measured. A significant correlation was observed between 24h-P and P/Cr (r = .76; P < .001); however, the agreement between methods showed that P/Cr overestimated proteinuria compared with 24h-P, particularly when the latter was >1 g/24 h. The Cox regression multivariate model showed an increased risk of graft loss associated with proteinuria when assessed by either 24h-P (hazard ratio [HR] 6.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.49–17.1) or P/Cr (HR 3.34, 95% CI 1.04–10.7). ConclusionsP/Cr is an method interchangeable with 24h-P for detecting proteinuria after KT. When proteinuria increases, the P/Cr overestimates 24h-P, even though it also has a significant and similar prognostic value for predicting graft survival.