Abstract

The current research on the relationship between 24-h central pressure and 24-h brachial pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is characterised by limited sample size and inconsistent findings. Furthermore, the association has never been explored in chronic kidney disease (CKD). A multicentre, cross-sectional study among non-dialysis patients with CKD was conducted. All participants underwent brachial and central ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using MobilO-Graph PWA, while trained cardiologists performed echocardiography. In this study, 2117 non-dialysis patients with CKD were examined. 24-h central systolic blood pressure with c2 calibration (24-h c2SBP) demonstrated a stronger association with left ventricular mass index and LVH compared with 24-h brachial systolic blood pressure (24-h bSBP) in the univariate and multivariate regression analyses. The multivariate net reclassification index (NRI) analysis revealed that 24-h c2SBP exhibited greater discriminatory power over 24-h bSBP (NRI = 0.310, 95% CI [0.192-0.429], P < 0.001). Applying 130/135 mmHg as the threshold for 24-h bSBP/c2SBP to cross-classify, the patients were divided into concordant normotension (1509 individuals), isolated brachial hypertension (155 individuals), isolated central hypertension (11 individuals), and concordant hypertension (442 individuals). With concordant normotension as the reference, the multivariable-adjusted ORs were 0.954 (95% CI, 0.534-1.640; P = 0.870) for isolated brachial hypertension and 2.585 (95%CI, 1.841-3.633; P < 0.001) for concordant hypertension. Among non-dialysis patients with CKD, 24-h c2SBP exhibits greater efficacy in identifying the presence of LVH compared with 24-h bSBP. The presence of LVH was greater in cases of concordant hypertension compared with cases of isolated brachial hypertension and concordant normotension.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call