235 A COMPARISON OF PARTHENOGENETIC DEVELOPMENT OF PORCINE OOCYTES SYNCHRONISED DURING MATURATION BY CYCLOHEXIMIDE OR cAMP

Abstract

In vitro maturation of porcine oocytes is characterized by a high level of asynchrony between oocytes. Previous studies reported that cycloheximide (CHX) and 3′, 5′-cyclic AMP (cAMP) synchronize porcine oocytes and improve development to blastocyst stage following IVF or have been used for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) (Ye et al. 2005 Biol. Reprod. 72(2), 399–406; Betthauser et al. 2000 Nat. Biotechnol. 18(10), 1055–1059). We previously reported that cAMP was more effective than CHX in synchronizing porcine oocyte maturation, producing MII oocytes in a shorter time window and providing a more homogenous population for future SCNT studies (Chen et al. 2008 SRF conference, 2008 abst, p34). Here we compared parthenogenetic development of porcine oocytes synchronized by these two treatments. Selected cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) obtained from slaughtered gilts were randomly divided into three groups and cultured at 39°C, 5% CO2 in air in modified NCSU-23 medium (with 1 μm glutathione, 1 mm cysteine, 5 mg L–1 insulin, 10 ng mL–1 epidermal growth factor, 10% (v/v) porcine follicular fluid, 1% essential and 0.5% nonessential amino acids) ± hormones (10 IU mL–1 PMSG and 10 IU mL–1 hCG): (1) with hormones for the first 22 h and then without hormones until 44 h; (2) with hormones and 5 μg mL–1 CHX for 12 h, and then with hormones but no CHX until 44 h; (3) with hormones and 1 mm cAMP for 22 h, and then without hormones and cAMP until 44 h. Parthenogenetic development of cycloheximide and cAMP treated oocytes was compared by cleavage rate at 48 h postactivation (hpa) and blastocyst formation at 168 hpa. No significant differences were observed in the frequency of cleavage (96.7 ± 2.1% v. 81.4 ± 11.6% v. 84.5 ± 5.7%), development to blastocyst (28.3 ± 11.4% v. 27.1 ± 5.7% v. 32.8 ± 5.3%) between control, CHX or cAMP treated oocytes, respectively (chi-square test, P > 0.05). However, total cell number was significantly higher in the CHX group than cAMP group (42.7 ± 4.1 v. 31.8 ± 2.0, respectively; t-test, P < 0.05). The results demonstrate that synchronization of porcine oocytes by treatment with CHX or cAMP does not affect subsequent parthenogenetic development if judged by the blastocyst formation, although the meaning of the difference of total cell numbers between CHX and cAMP treatments is still unclear.