Abstract

To compare the results of 23- and 20-gauge vitrectomies combined with phacoemulsification and aspiration and intraocular lens implantation (phacoemulsification surgery) 1 year after repair of idiopathic macular holes. Retrospective, consecutive, comparative case series. The medical charts of 100 consecutive eyes were reviewed that had undergone either 23- or 20-gauge vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification surgery to treat an idiopathic macular hole performed by 1 surgeon. The rate of improvement of the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acuity (VA) was calculated using the formula: (postoperative value - preoperative value) × 100/(1-year postoperative value - preoperative value). The macular holes closed successfully after the primary vitrectomy in all eyes in both groups. Although the VAs did not differ significantly before surgery or 1 year after surgery between the 2 groups, the VA improvement was significantly greater 1 and 3 months after surgery (P = .02, for both) in the 23-gauge group compared with the 20-gauge group. The induced corneal astigmatism levels 1 week and 1 and 3 months after surgery were significantly lower (P = .01, P = .01, and P = .03, respectively) and the surgical time was significantly shorter (P = .01) in the 23-gauge group than in the 20-gauge group. No apparent complications developed in either group. Since 23-gauge vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification surgery is advantageous because the VA improved rapidly after treating the macular holes with an acceptable safety profile, idiopathic macular holes are a good indication for 23-gauge vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification surgery.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.