Abstract

Considerable information has been obtained about neutrino mixing matrix. Present data show that in the particle data group (PDG) parametrization, the 2–3 mixing angle and the CP violating phase are consistent with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. A lot of efforts have been devoted to constructing models in realizing a mixing matrix with these values. However, the particular angles and phase are parametrization convention dependent. The meaning about the specific values for mixing angle and phase needs to be clarified. Using the well-known nine independent ways of parametrizing the mixing matrix, we show in detail how the mixing angles and phase change with conventions even with the 2–3 mixing angle to be [Formula: see text] and the CP violating phase to be [Formula: see text]. The original Kobayashi–Maskawa and an additional one belong to such a category. The other 6 parametrizations have mixing angles and phase very different values from those in the PDG parametrization although the physical effects are the same. Therefore one should give the specific parametrization convention when making statements about values for mixing angles and phase.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.