2260 Management of a Massive Liver Hemangioma: Does Size Matter?

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The majority of “giant” hemangiomas remain asymptomatic with no cause for surgical intervention; however, this may not hold true for massive tumors. The following case will review the challenges facing both patients and physicians when managing these atypical tumors. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: A 49-year-old male with no medical problems presented with complaints of post-prandial bloating, early satiety and mild epigastric discomfort. The bloating was intermittent for several years; however, symptoms have recently curtailed his eating habits. CBC, BMP and liver enzymes were unremarkable. An ultrasound highlighted a massively enlarged liver extending into the pelvis and displacing surrounding organs. The liver parenchyma appeared to be replaced with a homogenous, hyperechoic lesion. An MRI then illustrated a 29.5 × 20.1 × 19.4 cm, strongly hyperintense mass on T-2 weighted sequences consistent with the diagnosis of a hemangioma. He was referred to a hepatobiliary surgeon and an extended right hepatectomy was eventually performed. Histopathology results described vast endothelial lined channels supported by thin fibrous stroma without features of malignancy. The patient returned to clinic four weeks after surgery reporting complete resolution of his symptoms. DISCUSSION: Hemangiomas are the most common benign solid tumor of the liver with little to no risk of malignant transformation. Often discovered incidentally on imaging studies, the majority of these tumors remain indolent without the need for routine surveillance. Rarely these tumors become symptomatic, often correlating with tumor size. The definition of “giant” liver hemangioma remains controversial, with most authors assigning the label to tumors greater than 4cm or 5cm in size. It is for this reason that management of giant hemangiomas remains highly debated (i.e. observation versus resection). Recent studies have shown that tumors greater than 20cm in size pose a higher risk for GI symptoms related to mass effect on surrounding organs as well as causing a disturbance in the hematologic and coagulation systems. Surgical resection should be considered for symptomatic or complicated lesions, or when the diagnosis remains inconclusive. It is our belief that size classifications for giant hemangiomas requires further subgrouping to consider the danger of these massive tumors as well as the increased morbidity of surgery. Proper management of these tumors should be individualized to each patient and include a multidisciplinary team approach.