Abstract

BackgroundRapidly introducing appropriate antimicrobial therapy is crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality of patients hospitalized with pneumonia (PHP), and therapy is determined mostly by understanding causative pathogens. Ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) was recently approved and ceftolozane–tazobactam (C-T) is in late-stage clinical development for treating nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated.MethodsBacterial isolates were consecutively collected from PHP (1/patient) in 67 US medical centers in 2018 and the Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) were tested by reference broth microdilution methods for susceptibility (S) to CAZ-AVI, C-T, and many comparators at a central laboratory.ResultsThe most common organisms isolated from PHP were S. aureus (27.0%), P. aeruginosa (PSA) (24.6%), K. pneumoniae (KPN; 7.6%), E. coli (6.8%), S. marcescens (5.4%), and S. maltophilia (XM; 4.5%). Colistin (99.7%S), CAZ-AVI (95.7%S), and C-T (94.9%S) were the most active compounds against PSA; CAZ-AVI (99.9%S), amikacin (AMK; 98.8%S), and meropenem (MEM; 97.6%S) were the most active compounds against Enterobacterales (ENT). CAZ-AVI and C-T retained activity against PSA isolates non-S (NS) to piperacillin–tazobactam (PIP-TAZ), MEM, and cefepime (FEP), whereas PSA isolates NS to PIP-TAZ, MEM, or FEP exhibited low S rates to PIP-TAZ (≤ 39.2%), MEM (≤ 37.8%), and FEP (≤ 38.0%; Table). CAZ-AVI and tigecycline were the only compounds with good activity against carbapenem-resistant ENT (CRE), both with 96.6%S. Among ENT, the most common ESBL and carbapenemase were CTX-M-15 (73%) and KPC-2/3 (76%), respectively. CAZ-AVI was active against all ESBL producers (100.0%S), whereas the S rate to C-T was 82.4%. The most active compounds against multidrug-resistant (MDR) ENT were CAZ-AVI (98.9%S), AMK (91.5%S), and MEM (80.8%S). XM and A. baumannii exhibited low S rates to most antimicrobials tested.ConclusionGram-negative bacteria were isolated from 70% of PHP, and PSA and ENT represented >80% of these organisms. CAZ-AVI and C-T showed similar coverage (%S) against PSA (95.7–94.9%S). In contrast, C-T was less active than CAZ-AVI against ENT in general and exhibited limited activity against ENT-resistant subsets. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.