Abstract

Abstract Aim Firstly, assess the compliance of our Trust with the DG27 NICE Guidelines (2017) recommending universal screening of patients with Colorectal Cancer (CRC) for Lynch Syndrome (LS), using Immunohistochemistry or Microsatellite Instability testing. Secondly, provide a cost estimate for the Trust to implement universal screening for LS. Method Retrospective data collection for all CRC resection specimens reported by the Trust's Pathology Lab in 2019, and check of pathology reports, Clinic letters, and lab results through the Trust's electronic system for screening for LS. Cost estimates were calculated using information from the Histopathology Department and similar Audits by other NHS Trusts. Results From the 361 colorectal resection specimens examined at the Trust's Pathology lab, 340 were not screened for LS (NICE Guidelines compliance = 5.8%). Of the 21 screened, 12 patients did not have LS, and for 9 screening was not completed. By categorising the patients into groups by age, location of cancer, and presence of synchronous or metachronous cancers, we found that there was no consistent rationale behind screening (i.e., patients with phenotypical characteristics traditionally related to LS were not screened). We estimated that universal LS screening would cost the Trust approximately £25,000 annually. Conclusions There is extremely poor compliance with the NICE Guidelines in a Trust with one of the highest numbers of CRC resections annually. Even the Amsterdam Criteria are not used to screen patients for LS. Screening could change the surgical and oncological management of the patients and also suggest different surveillance and prophylaxis for the affected family members.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.