22 FTY720 ENHANCEMENT OF PULMONARY ENDOTHELIAL BARRIER FUNCTION IS S1P1 RECEPTOR INDEPENDENT

Differential Regulation of Pulmonary Endothelial Monolayer Integrity by Varying Degrees of Cyclic Stretch

Pulmonary endothelial cell barrier enhancement by FTY720 does not require the S1P 1 receptor

We previously reported sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) augment endothelial cell (EC) barrier function and attenuate murine acute lung inury (ALI). While the mechanisms underlying these effects are not fully understood, S1P and HGF both transactivate the S1P receptor, S1PR1 and integrin β4 (ITGB4) at membrane caveolin-enriched microdomains (CEMs). In the current study, we investigated the roles of S1PR2 and S1PR3 in S1P/HGF-mediated EC signaling and their associations with ITGB4. Our studies confirmed ITGB4 and S1PR2/3 are recruited to CEMs in human lung EC in response to either S1P (1 µM, 5 min) or HGF (25 ng/ml, 5 min). Co-immunoprecipitation experiments identified an S1P/HGF-mediated interaction of ITGB4 with both S1PR2 and S1PR3. We then employed an in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) to confirm a direct ITGB4-S1PR3 association induced by S1P/HGF although a direct association was not detectable between S1PR2 and ITGB4. S1PR1 knockdown (siRNA), however, abrogated S1P/HGF-induced ITGB4-S1PR2 associations while there was no effect on ITGB4-S1PR3 associations. Moreover, PLA confirmed a direct association between S1PR1 and S1PR2 induced by S1P and HGF. Finally, silencing of S1PR2 significantly attenuated S1P/HGF-induced EC barrier enhancement as measured by transendothelial resistance while silencing of S1PR3 significantly augmented S1P/HGF-induced barrier enhancement. These results confirm an important role for S1PR2 and S1PR3 in S1P/HGF-mediated EC barrier responses that are associated with their complex formation with ITGB4. Our findings elucidate novel mechanisms of EC barrier regulation that may ultimately lead to new therapeutic targets for disorders characterized by increased vascular permeability including ALI.

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is a physiologically relevant agonist released by activated platelets with complex effects mediated via activation of P2 receptors. Although ATP-induced endothelial cell (EC) production of prostacyclin and...

Novel therapies are needed to address the vascular endothelial cell (EC) barrier disruption that occurs in inflammatory diseases such as acute lung injury (ALI). We previously demonstrated the potent barrier-enhancing effects of both sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and the structurally similar compound FTY720 [2-amino-2-(2-[4-octylphenyl]ethyl)-1,3-propanediol] in inflammatory lung injury. In this study, we examined the therapeutic potential of several novel FTY720 analogs to reduce vascular leak. Similar to S1P and FTY720, the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of FTY720 phosphonate and enephosphonate analogs produce sustained EC barrier enhancement in vitro, as seen by increases in transendothelial electrical resistance (TER). In contrast, the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers of FTY720-regioisomeric analogs disrupt EC barrier integrity in a dose-dependent manner. Barrier-enhancing FTY720 analogs demonstrate a wider protective concentration range in vitro (1-50 microM) and greater potency than either S1P or FTY720. In contrast to FTY720-induced EC barrier enhancement, S1P and the FTY720 analogs dramatically increase TER within minutes in association with cortical actin ring formation. Unlike S1P, these FTY720 analogs exhibit differential phosphorylation effects without altering the intracellular calcium level. Inhibitor studies indicate that barrier enhancement by these analogs involves signaling via G(i)-coupled receptors, tyrosine kinases, and lipid rafts. Consistent with these in vitro responses, the (S)-phosphonate analog of FTY720 significantly reduces multiple indices of alveolar and vascular permeability in a lipopolysaccharide-mediated murine model of ALI (without significant alterations in leukocyte counts). These results demonstrate the capacity for FTY720 analogs to significantly decrease pulmonary vascular leakage and inflammation in vitro and in vivo.

Differential involvement of ezrin/radixin/moesin proteins in sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced human pulmonary endothelial cell barrier enhancement

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is a blood-borne lysosphingolipid that acts to promote endothelial cell (EC) barrier function. In plasma, S1P is associated with both high density lipoproteins (HDL) and albumin, but it is not known whether the carriers impart different effects on S1P signaling. Here we establish that HDL-S1P sustains EC barrier longer than albumin-S1P. We showed that the sustained barrier effects of HDL-S1P are dependent on signaling by the S1P receptor, S1P1, and involve persistent activation of Akt and endothelial NOS (eNOS), as well as activity of the downstream NO target, soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC). Total S1P1 protein levels were found to be higher in response to HDL-S1P treatment as compared with albumin-S1P, and this effect was not associated with increased S1P1 mRNA or dependent on de novo protein synthesis. Several pieces of evidence indicate that long term EC barrier enhancement activity of HDL-S1P is due to specific effects on S1P1 trafficking. First, the rate of S1P1 degradation, which is proteasome-mediated, was slower in HDL-S1P-treated cells as compared with cells treated with albumin-S1P. Second, the long term barrier-promoting effects of HDL-S1P were abrogated by treatment with the recycling blocker, monensin. Finally, cell surface levels of S1P1 and levels of S1P1 in caveolin-enriched microdomains were higher after treatment with HDL-S1P as compared with albumin-S1P. Together, the findings reveal S1P carrier-specific effects on S1P1 and point to HDL as the physiological mediator of sustained S1P1-PI3K-Akt-eNOS-sGC-dependent EC barrier function.

ATP is a physiologically relevant agonist released by various sources, including activated platelets, with complex effects mediated via activation of P(2) purinergic receptors. ATP-induced endothelial cell (EC) production of prostacyclin and nitric oxide is recognized, and EC barrier enhancement evoked by ATP has been described. ATP effects on EC barrier function and vascular permeability, however, remain poorly characterized. Although the mechanisms involved are unclear, we previously identified activation of the small GTPase Rac and translocation of cortactin, an actin-binding protein, as key to EC barrier augmentation induced by simvastatin and sphingosine 1-phosphate and therefore examined the role of these molecules in ATP-induced EC barrier enhancement. ATP induced rapid, dose-dependent barrier enhancement in human pulmonary artery EC as measured by transendothelial electrical resistance, with a peak effect appreciable at 25 min (39% increase, 10 microM) and persisting at 2 h. These effects were associated with rearrangement of the EC actin cytoskeleton, early myosin light chain phosphorylation, and spatially defined (cell periphery) translocation of both Rac and cortactin. ATP (10 microM)-treated EC demonstrated a significant increase in Rac activation relative to controls, with a maximal effect (approximately 4-fold increase) at 10 min. Finally, ATP-induced barrier enhancement was markedly attenuated by reductions of either Rac or cortactin (small interfering RNA) relative to controls. Our results suggest for the first time that ATP-mediated barrier protection is associated with cytoskeletal activation and is dependent on both Rac activation and cortactin.

We have previously shown that Gs-coupled adenosine receptors (A2a) are primarily involved in adenosine-induced human pulmonary artery endothelial cell (HPAEC) barrier enhancement. However, the downstream events that mediate the strengthening of the endothelial cell (EC) barrier via adenosine signaling are largely unknown. In the current study, we tested the overall hypothesis that adenosine-induced Rac1 activation and EC barrier enhancement is mediated by Gs-dependent stimulation of cAMP-dependent Epac1-mediated signaling cascades. Adenoviral transduction of HPAEC with constitutively-active (C/A) Rac1 (V12Rac1) significantly increases transendothelial electrical resistance (TER) reflecting an enhancement of the EC barrier. Conversely, expression of an inactive Rac1 mutant (N17Rac1) decreases TER reflecting a compromised EC barrier. The adenosine-induced increase in TER was accompanied by activation of Rac1, decrease in contractility (MLC dephosphorylation), but not Rho inhibition. Conversely, inhibition of Rac1 activity attenuates adenosine-induced increase in TER. We next examined the role of cAMP-activated Epac1 and its putative downstream targets Rac1, Vav2, Rap1, and Tiam1. Depletion of Epac1 attenuated the adenosine-induced Rac1 activation and the increase in TER. Furthermore, silencing of Rac1 specific guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), Vav2 and Rap1a expression significantly attenuated adenosine-induced increases in TER and activation of Rac1. Depletion of Rap1b only modestly impacted adenosine-induced increases in TER and Tiam1 depletion had no effect on adenosine-induced Rac1 activation and TER. Together these data strongly suggest that Rac1 activity is required for adenosine-induced EC barrier enhancement and that the activation of Rac1 and ability to strengthen the EC barrier depends, at least in part, on cAMP-dependent Epac1/Vav2/Rap1-mediated signaling.

Protective effects of high-molecular weight Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) in human lung endothelial cell barrier regulation: Role of actin cytoskeletal rearrangement

Endothelial cell (EC) barrier dysfunction results in increased vascular permeability observed in inflammation, tumor angiogenesis, and atherosclerosis. The platelet-derived phospholipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) decreases EC permeability in vitro and in vivo and thus has obvious therapeutic potential. We examined S1P-mediated human pulmonary artery EC signaling and barrier regulation in caveolin-enriched microdomains (CEM). Immunoblotting from S1P-treated EC revealed S1P-mediated rapid recruitment (1 microM, 5 min) to CEMs of the S1P receptors S1P1 and S1P3, p110 PI3 kinase alpha and beta catalytic subunits, the Rac1 GEF, Tiam1, and alpha-actinin isoforms 1 and 4. Immunoprecipitated p110 PI3 kinase catalytic subunits from S1P-treated EC exhibited PIP3 production in CEMs. Immunoprecipitation of S1P receptors from CEM fractions revealed complexes containing Tiam1 and S1P1. PI3 kinase inhibition (LY294002) attenuated S1P-induced Tiam1 association with S1P1, Tiam1/Rac1 activation, alpha-actinin-1/4 recruitment, and EC barrier enhancement. Silencing of either S1P1 or Tiam1 expression resulted in the loss of S1P-mediated Rac1 activation and alpha-actinin-1/4 recruitment to CEM. Finally, silencing S1P1, Tiam1, or both alpha-actinin isoforms 1/4 inhibits S1P-induced cortical F-actin rearrangement and S1P-mediated barrier enhancement. Taken together, these results suggest that S1P-induced recruitment of S1P1 to CEM fractions promotes PI3 kinase-mediated Tiam1/Rac1 activation required for alpha-actinin-1/4-regulated cortical actin rearrangement and EC barrier enhancement.

Immunosuppressant drugs such as cyclosporin have allowed widespread organ transplantation, but their utility remains limited by toxicities, and they are ineffective in chronic management of autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis. In contrast, the immune modulating drug FTY720 is efficacious in a variety of transplant and autoimmune models without inducing a generalized immunosuppressed state and is effective in human kidney transplantation. FTY720 elicits a lymphopenia resulting from a reversible redistribution of lymphocytes from circulation to secondary lymphoid tissues by unknown mechanisms. Using FTY720 and several analogs, we show now that FTY720 is phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase; the phosphorylated compound is a potent agonist at four sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors and represents the therapeutic principle in a rodent model of multiple sclerosis. Our results suggest that FTY720, after phosphorylation, acts through sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling pathways to modulate chemotactic responses and lymphocyte trafficking.

Immune complex (IC) deposition activates polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), increases vascular permeability, and leads to organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. The bioactive lipid sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), acting via S1P receptor 1 (S1P1 ), is a key regulator of endothelial cell (EC) barrier function. This study was undertaken to investigate whether augmenting EC integrity via S1P1 signaling attenuates inflammatory injury mediated by ICs. In vitro barrier function was assessed in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by electrical cell-substrate impedance sensing. Phosphorylation of myosin light chain 2 (p-MLC-2) and VE-cadherin staining in HUVECs were assessed by immunofluorescence. A reverse Arthus reaction (RAR) was induced in the skin and lungs of mice with S1P1 deleted from ECs (S1P1 EC-knockout [ECKO] mice) and mice treated with S1P1 agonists and antagonists. S1P1 agonists prevented loss of barrier function in HUVECs treated with IC-activated PMNs. S1P1 ECKO and wild-type (WT) mice treated with S1P1 antagonists had amplified RAR, whereas specific S1P1 agonists attenuated skin and lung RAR in WT mice. ApoM-Fc, a novel S1P chaperone, mitigated EC cell barrier dysfunction induced by activated PMNs invitro and attenuated lung RAR. Expression levels of p-MLC-2 and disruption of VE-cadherin, each representing manifestations of cell contraction and destabilization of adherens junctions, respectively, that were induced by activated PMNs, were markedly reduced by treatment with S1P1 agonists and ApoM-Fc. Our findings indicate that S1P1 signaling in ECs modulates vascular responses to IC deposition. S1P1 agonists and ApoM-Fc enhance the EC barrier, limit leukocyte escape from capillaries, and provide protection against inflammatory injury. The S1P/S1P1 axis is a newly identified target to attenuate tissue responses to IC deposition and mitigate end-organ damage.

Dual role of vinculin in barrier-disruptive and barrier-enhancing endothelial cell responses

Article Figures and data Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods Data availability References Decision letter Author response Article and author information Metrics Abstract Somatosensory neurons mediate responses to diverse mechanical stimuli, from innocuous touch to noxious pain. While recent studies have identified distinct populations of A mechanonociceptors (AMs) that are required for mechanical pain, the molecular underpinnings of mechanonociception remain unknown. Here, we show that the bioactive lipid sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and S1P Receptor 3 (S1PR3) are critical regulators of acute mechanonociception. Genetic or pharmacological ablation of S1PR3, or blockade of S1P production, significantly impaired the behavioral response to noxious mechanical stimuli, with no effect on responses to innocuous touch or thermal stimuli. These effects are mediated by fast-conducting A mechanonociceptors, which displayed a significant decrease in mechanosensitivity in S1PR3 mutant mice. We show that S1PR3 signaling tunes mechanonociceptor excitability via modulation of KCNQ2/3 channels. Our findings define a new role for S1PR3 in regulating neuronal excitability and establish the importance of S1P/S1PR3 signaling in the setting of mechanical pain thresholds. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33285.001 Introduction Pain is a complex sensation. It serves to protect organisms from harmful stimuli, but can also become chronic and debilitating following tissue injury and disease. Distinct cells and molecules detect noxious thermal and mechanical stimuli. Thermal pain is detected by thermosensitive TRP channels in subsets of nociceptors (Caterina et al., 2000; Vriens et al., 2011), and gentle touch is detected by Piezo2 channels in low-threshold mechanoreceptors (LTMRs) (Ranade et al., 2014; Woo et al., 2014). Aδ high-threshold mechanoreceptors (HTMRs) have been shown to play a key role in responses to painful mechanical stimuli (Arcourt et al., 2017; Ghitani et al., 2017). Recent studies have shown that there are at least two populations of HTMRs that mediate responses to noxious mechanical stimuli. The Npy2r+ subpopulation of HTMRs mediates fast paw withdrawal responses to pinprick stimulation and terminates as free nerve endings in the epidermis (Arcourt et al., 2017). The Calca+ subpopulation of circumferential-HTMRs responds to noxious force and hair pulling, and terminates as circumferential endings wrapped around guard hair follicles (Ghitani et al., 2017). Additionally, somatostatin-expressing interneurons of laminae I-III in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord receive input from nociceptors and are required for behavioral responses to painful mechanical stimuli (Duan et al., 2014). Despite these advances in defining the cells and circuits of mechanical pain, little is known about the molecular signaling pathways in mechanonociceptors. Here, we show that sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is required for mechanical pain sensation. S1P is a bioactive lipid that signals via 5 G-protein coupled S1P Receptors (S1PRs 1–5). S1P signaling, mainly via S1PR1, plays a well-known role in immune cell migration and maturation (Spiegel and Milstien, 2003; Matloubian et al., 2004; Schwab et al., 2005). Additionally, recent studies have shown that S1PRs are expressed throughout the nervous system (Janes et al., 2014; Mair et al., 2011; Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013) and S1P signaling is associated with a variety of neuroinflammatory disorders, including multiple sclerosis (Brinkmann et al., 2010) and Alzheimer's disease (Couttas et al., 2014). S1P has been implicated in spontaneous pain (Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013) and thermal pain hypersensitivity (Mair et al., 2011; Finley et al., 2013; Weth et al., 2015), but due to conflicting accounts of S1P receptor expression in the CNS (Janes et al., 2014; Weth-Malsch et al., 2016) and PNS (Mair et al., 2011; Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013; Usoskin et al., 2015) as well as inconsistent reports on the effects of S1P on neuronal excitability (Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2015) and pain behaviors (Mair et al., 2011; Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013; Finley et al., 2013; Weth et al., 2015), the role of S1P in somatosensation remains controversial. We found that mice lacking the S1P receptor S1PR3 display striking and selective deficits in behavioral responses to noxious mechanical stimuli. Likewise, peripheral blockade of S1PR3 signaling or S1P production impairs mechanical sensitivity. We show that S1P constitutively enhances the excitability of A mechanonociceptors (AMs) via closure of KCNQ2/3 potassium channels to tune mechanical pain sensitivity. The effects of S1P are completely dependent on S1PR3. While previous studies have shown that elevated S1P triggers acute pain and injury-evoked thermal sensitization (Mair et al., 2011; Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013), we now demonstrate that baseline levels of S1P are necessary and sufficient for setting normal mechanical pain thresholds. By contrast, elevated S1P selectively triggers thermal sensitization via activation of TRPV1+ heat nociceptors, with no effect on mechanical hypersensitivity. Our findings uncover an essential role for constitutive S1P signaling in mechanical pain. Results To identify candidate genes underlying mechanosensation, we previously performed transcriptome analysis of the sensory ganglia innervating the ultra-sensitive tactile organ (the star) of the star-nosed mole (Gerhold et al., 2013). Immunostaining revealed the tactile organ is preferentially innervated by myelinated Aδ fibers (Gerhold et al., 2013), which are primarily mechanosensitive. While our original analysis focused on ion channels enriched in the neurons of the star organ, our dataset also revealed enrichment of several components of the S1P pathway, including S1pr3. Likewise, single-cell RNA seq of mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons revealed S1pr3 expression in a subset of myelinated mechanoreceptors (Usoskin et al., 2015) in addition to a subpopulation of peptidergic C nociceptors. S1P promotes excitability in small-diameter, capsaicin-sensitive nociceptors (Mair et al., 2011; Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2015). In addition, S1PR3 has been shown to mediate spontaneous pain triggered by elevated S1P and thermal sensitization following sterile tissue injury (Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013). However, no studies have examined the role of S1PR3 in mechanosensation or in regulating somatosensory behaviors under normal conditions. Given the enrichment of S1pr3 in mechanosensory neurons of the star-nosed mole and mouse, we hypothesized that S1P signaling via S1PR3 may also play a role in mechanosensation. Thus, we set out to define the role of S1P signaling and S1PR3 in somatosensory mechanoreceptors. S1PR3 mediates acute mechanical pain We first examined a variety of somatosensory behaviors in mice lacking S1PR3 (Kono et al., 2004) (S1pr3tm1Rlp/Mmnc; referred to herein as S1PR3 KO). We initially investigated baseline responses to mechanical stimuli. S1PR3 KO mice displayed a dramatic loss of mechanical sensitivity (Figure 1A; see Figure 1—source data 1), as von Frey paw withdrawal thresholds were significantly elevated in S1PR3 KO mice relative to WT and S1PR3 HET littermates (mean thresholds: 1.737 g vs. 0.736 and 0.610 g, respectively). Moreover, S1PR3 KO mice demonstrated decreased responses to a range of noxious tactile stimuli (2–6 g; Figure 1B) and to noxious pinprick stimulation (Figure 1C), but normal responsiveness to innocuous tactile stimuli (0.6–1.4 g; Figure 1B). S1PR3 KO mice exhibited normal tape removal attempts (Ranade et al., 2014) (Figure 1D), righting reflexes (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A), radiant heat withdrawal latencies (Figure 1E), and itch-evoked scratching (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). These results demonstrate a selective role for S1PR3 in acute mechanical pain. Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all Download asset Open asset S1PR3 mediates acute mechanical pain. (A) von Frey 50% withdrawal threshold measurements for S1pr3+/+ (WT, N = 8), S1pr3+/- (HET, N = 7) and S1pr3-/- (KO, N = 12) mice. p<0.0001 (one-way ANOVA). Tukey-Kramer post hoc comparisons for KO and HET to WT indicated on graph. (B) von Frey force-response graph for WT (N = 8) versus KO (N = 12) animals; pgenotype <0.0001 (two-way ANOVA). Tukey HSD comparisons between genotypes are indicated for given forces. (C) % withdrawal to pinprick stimulation of hindpaw for HET versus KO animals; p<0.0001 (unpaired t-test; N = 5–7 mice per group). (D) Number of attempted removal bouts in tape assay for WT (N = 2), HET (N = 2), and KO (N = 5) mice; p=0.172 (one-way ANOVA). (E) Baseline radiant heat measurements for WT (N = 8), HET (N = 3), and KO (N = 5) mice; p=0.444 (one-way ANOVA). (F) von Frey 50% withdrawal threshold measurements for mice pre- and post-injection of 500 µM TY 52156 (N = 10), 10 µM W146 (N = 6), or 1% DMSO-PBS vehicle (N = 17); p=0.016, 0.650 (two-tailed paired t-test comparing vehicle- vs. drug-injected paw). (G) von Frey force-response graph for mice injected with either 1% DMSO-PBS (N = 4) or 500 µM TY 52156 (N = 4); ptreatment <0.0001 (two-way ANOVA). Tukey HSD comparisons were made between treatment groups and significant differences at a given force are indicated on graph. Error bars represent mean ± SD. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33285.002 Figure 1—source data 1 S1PR3 mediates acute mechanical pain. Related to Figure 1. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33285.004 Download elife-33285-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx As a complement to our analysis of somatosensation in S1PR3 KO animals, we employed a pharmacological approach, using the S1PR3-selective antagonist TY 52156 (TY) (Nussbaum et al., 2015). Similar to the phenotype of knockout animals, intradermal injection of 500 µM TY into the mouse hindpaw (the site of testing) triggered a rapid and significant elevation in von Frey paw withdrawal thresholds (Figure 1F) and decreased responsiveness to noxious (2–6 g), but not innocuous (0.6–1.4 g), tactile stimuli (Figure 1G), without affecting noxious heat sensitivity (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). By contrast, blockade of S1PR1 with the selective antagonist W146 (Finley et al., 2013) had no effect on baseline mechanical or thermal thresholds (Figure 1F; Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Overall, these data show that S1PR3 signaling sets mechanical pain sensitivity. Endogenous S1P mediates acute mechanical pain We next asked whether peripheral S1P was required for the S1PR3-dependent effects on mechanosensation. We decreased S1P levels via injection of the sphingosine kinase inhibitor SKI II to block local production of S1P (Chiba et al., 2010) or elevated S1P levels via intradermal injection of S1P and measured behaviors 30 min after injection. Decreasing local S1P levels with SKI II significantly reduced mechanical sensitivity (Figure 2A; see Figure 2—source data 1), comparable to the hyposensitivity phenotype observed in S1PR3 KO mice (Figure 1A). Again, similar to what was observed in S1PR3 KO animals (Figure 1E), peripheral blockade of S1P production had no effect on baseline thermal sensitivity (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). Surprisingly, injecting exogenous S1P (10 µM; maximum solubility in saline vehicle) had no effect on mechanical sensitivity (Figure 2A–B). However, as previously reported (Mair et al., 2011; Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013), S1P injection triggered S1PR3-dependent thermal hypersensitivity and spontaneous pain (Figure 2C–D), demonstrating that the lack of effect on mechanical hypersensitivity is not due to problems with S1P delivery or degradation. Figure 2 Download asset Open asset Endogenous S1P mediates acute mechanical pain. (A) von Frey 50% withdrawal measurements for mice pre- and post-injection of 50 µM SKI II (N = 8) or 10 µM S1P (N = 7); p=0.003, 0.604 (two-tailed paired t-tests). (B) von Frey force-response graph for animals injected with 10 µM S1P or 0.1% MeOH-PBS; pgenotype >0.05 (two-way ANOVA; N = 8 mice per group). No Tukey HSD comparisons at any force between genotypes were significant. (C) Intradermal cheek injection of 10 µM S1P, 2 µM, 0.2 µM, and 20 µL 0.3% methanol PBS (vehicle), with quantification of number of forepaw wipes over the 5 min post-injection interval; p<0.0001 (one-way ANOVA; N = 3 mice per condition). Dunnett's multiple comparisons p-values are represented on graph for comparisons made between treated and vehicle groups. (D) Radiant heat normalized paw withdrawal latencies 20–30 min post injection of 15 µL 10 µM S1P, 0.2 µM S1P. or 0.3% methanol-PBS vehicle (i.d.) into the hind paw of S1PR3 WT or KO mice; p=0.0129 (one-way ANOVA; N = 3–10 mice per condition). Dunnett's multiple comparisons p-values are represented on graph for comparisons made between treated and vehicle groups. (E) von Frey 50% withdrawal measurements for mice pre- (baseline) and post-injection of 50 µM SKI II (N = 14) and 0 (N = 4), 10 (N = 3), 75 (N = 4), or 200 nM S1P (N = 3; one-way ANOVA; p=0.0001). Tukey Kramer comparisons are indicated on graph. Error bars represent mean ± SD. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33285.005 Figure 2—source data 1 Endogenous S1P mediates acute mechanical pain. Related to Figure 2. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33285.006 Download elife-33285-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx These data support a model whereby S1P constitutively activates S1PR3 to set normal mechanical pain thresholds. To further test this model, we asked if the mechanical hyposensitivity elicited after endogenous S1P depletion (via SKI II) could be rescued by local injection of exogenous S1P. Indeed, we found that injection of exogenous S1P reversed SKI II-induced mechanical hyposensitivity in a dose-dependent manner, and observed a maximal effect with 200 nM S1P (Figure 2E). Although quantification of native S1P levels in skin is inaccurate owing to avid lyase activity (Shaner et al., 2009), our data establish that baseline S1P levels are sufficient to maximally exert their effect on S1PR3-dependent mechanical pain, such that increased S1P does not evoke mechanical hypersensitivity, but diminished S1P leads to mechanical hyposensitivity. These data show that constitutive activation of S1PR3 by S1P is required for normal mechanosensitivity. S1PR3 is expressed in A mechanonociceptors and thermal nociceptors Our behavioral data showing distinct roles for S1PR3 in mechanonociception and thermal hypersensitivity suggest that S1PR3 is expressed in distinct subsets of somatosensory neurons. While a previous study suggested that all somatosensory neurons express S1PR3 (Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013), single cell RNA seq data suggests S1pr3 is not expressed by all DRG neurons (Usoskin et al., 2015), and no studies have performed quantitative analysis of S1PR3 staining or co-staining to define subpopulations of S1PR3+ neurons. We thus set out to characterize the somatosensory neuron subtypes expressing S1pr3 using in situ hybridization (ISH) of wild-type somatosensory ganglia and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in an S1pr3mCherry/+ reporter mouse (Sanna et al., 2016). We first used in situ hybridization (ISH) with a specific S1pr3 probe to examine expression patterns of S1pr3 (Figure 3A–B; see Supplementary file 1). In our experiments, 43% of cells from wild-type DRG expressed S1pr3. Co-ISH revealed that one population of S1pr3+ neurons represents Aδ mechanonociceptors (AMs). These cells expressed Scn1a (39.9% of all S1pr3+), a gene that encodes the Nav1.1 sodium channel, which mediates mechanical pain in Aδ fibers (Osteen et al., 2016). S1pr3+ cells also co-expressed Npy2r (20.4% of all S1pr3+), a marker of a subset of mechanonociceptive A fibers (Arcourt et al., 2017). S1pr3 was expressed in 70.6% of Scn1a+ cells and 72% of Npy2r+ cells, comprising a majority of both of these populations. Interestingly, a subset of cells co-expressed S1pr3 and the mechanically sensitive channel Piezo2, which is expressed by Aβ, Aδ, and C fibers (Ranade et al., 2014). The remaining S1pr3+ cells were Trpv1+ and/or Trpa1+ C nociceptors (67.1% of all S1pr3+), which are reported to overlap minimally with the Scn1a+ and Npy2r+ populations (Arcourt et al., 2017; Osteen et al., 2016). Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all Download asset Open asset S1pr3 is expressed in A mechanonociceptors and C thermal nociceptors. (A) (Top) Representative co-ISH of S1pr3 (green; left) with Scn1a, Npy2r, Piezo2, and Trpv1 (magenta; center) in sectioned DRG. Right column: overlay with co-localized regions colored white (10x air objective; scale = 100 µm). (B) Bar chart showing the % of total cells expressing the indicated marker (grey) and the % of total cells co-expressing both marker and S1pr3 (green). See Table S1 for quantification. (C) Representative IHC images of sectioned DRG from S1pr3mCherry/+ animals stained with anti-DsRed (green, S1PR3) and anti-Peripherin (left, magenta) or anti-NF200 (right, magenta). Arrows indicate co-stained cells. Images were acquired using a 10x air objective (scale = 100 µm). (D) Whole-mount skin IHC confocal images with anti-DsRed antibody (S1PR3, green) and anti-NefH antibody (NF200, magenta) in an S1pr3mCherry/+ animal (20x water objective; scale = 50 µm). Arrows indicate co-positive free nerves (left image). Arrowheads indicate NF200- free nerves (left) or S1PR3- circumferential fibers (right image). (E) Sectioned skin IHC with anti-DsRed (S1PR3) and anti-NefH (NF200, left, top right) or anti-DsRed (S1PR3) and anti-beta-tubulin III (BTIII, bottom right) antibody (magenta) in S1pr3mCherry/+ skin (20x air objective; scale = 50 µm). Arrows indicate co-positive free nerve endings (left), S1PR3-negative lanceolate/circumferential hair follicle endings (top right, arrow = circumferential, arrowhead = lanceolate), or S1PR3-negative putative Merkel afferent (bottom right). (F) (Left) Quantification of sectioned DRG IHC experiments showing % of S1PR3+ cells that co-stained with indicated markers (n > 250 cells per marker). (Right) Quantification of sectioned skin IHC experiments showing % of fibers positive for indicated marker that co-stained with S1PR3 (anti-DsRed; n = 10 images per marker from two animals). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33285.007 We next used an S1pr3mCherry/+ reporter mouse, which produces a functional S1PR3-mCherry fusion protein (Sanna et al., 2016), as an independent strategy to explore S1PR3 expression and localization. This strategy was used because we found that anti-S1PR3 antibodies showed broad immunoreactivity in DRG from mice lacking S1PR3, and so we instead used anti-DsRed antibodies to probe expression of the S1PR3 fusion protein (Figure 3—figure supplement 1E). We found that 42.4% of S1PR3+ cells co-stained with anti-Peripherin, demonstrating that S1PR3 is expressed in a subset of small-diameter neurons. We also observed that 69.5% of S1PR3+ cells co-stained with anti-NF200, which marks medium and large-diameter myelinated neurons. Furthermore, we observed that S1PR3+ cells were primarily of small to medium diameter (11.3–35.1 µm), whereas all cells in the DRG ranged from 11.3 to 53.9 µm. Overall, these data support the expression of S1PR3 in subsets of small-diameter thermal nociceptors and medium-diameter mechanonociceptors (Figure 3F). Additionally, no significant differences were observed between WT and S1PR3 KO DRG in number of Trpa1+, Trpv1+, Peripherin+, NF200+, or IB4+ cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B–C,F,G). The mean diameters of Trpv1+ neurons (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D, left), NF200+ neurons (Figure 3—figure supplement 1G), or all neurons (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D, right) in WT versus KO DRG were not significantly different, suggesting no loss of major sensory neuronal subtypes in the S1PR3 KO. We then visualized S1PR3 expression in nerve fibers that innervate the skin using anti-DsRed antibodies in whole-mount immunohistochemistry (IHC; Figure 3D). The reporter animals showed no specific antibody staining in epidermal or dermal cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 1I), and single-cell RNA seq of a diverse array of mouse epidermal and dermal cells corroborates this lack of expression (Joost et al., 2016). We observed overlap of S1PR3-expressing free nerve endings with NF200+ myelinated free nerves and NF200- putative C-fiber endings (Figure 3F), but did not observe expression of S1PR3 in NF200+ circumferential or lanceolate hair follicle receptors, or in putative Merkel afferents (Figure 3D–E). β-tubulin III, PGP9.5 (pan-neuronal markers), and NF200 staining in S1PR3 KO skin displayed patterns of epidermal and dermal innervation similar to WT skin, suggesting the phenotypes observed in the S1PR3 KO mice are not due to developmental loss of sensory neuronal innervation (pPGP9.5= 0.443 (n = 93, 38 fibers); pNefH = 0.405 (n = 61, 28 fibers); pBTIII = 0.353 (n = 104, 89 fibers); two-tailed t-tests based on average number of fibers per field of view). These results support expression of S1PR3 in subsets of myelinated A mechanonociceptors and unmyelinated C nociceptors that terminate as free nerve endings. S1P activates thermal nociceptors but not putative AMs Live imaging of cultured DRG neurons from adult reporter animals showed expression of S1PR3-mCherry fusion protein in 48.3% of neurons, mirroring our ISH and IHC results (Figure 4A). To examine the effects of S1P on A mechanonociceptors and C nociceptors, we performed ratiometric calcium imaging and electrophysiology on DRG cultures from reporter mice. Interestingly, only 56.1 ± 22.4% of mCherry-expressing neurons were activated by 1 µM S1P (Representative trace in Figure 4B; representative images in Figure 4C), which our dose-response showed to be the saturating concentration for calcium influx (Figure 4D; EC50 = 155 nM). neurons were also capsaicin-sensitive (n > sensory neurons from S1PR3 KO animals did not to S1P, as (Camprubí-Robles et al., 2013), exhibited responses that were not significantly from WT neurons (Figure 3—figure supplement The mean diameter of neurons was ± whereas the mean diameter of neurons was ± two-tailed We also performed cell experiments with studies (Mair et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2015), found that S1P in capsaicin-sensitive small diameter cells (Figure This that only the small-diameter, S1PR3+ putative nociceptors are by S1P. We next asked whether the S1PR3+ diameter neurons represent the mechanonociceptors observed by ISH (Figure To this we asked whether the a selective of nociceptors (Osteen et al., 2016), triggers calcium influx in S1PR3-expressing neurons. Indeed, we found that ± of neurons expressed (Figure with our staining showing expression of S1pr3 in nociceptors and the role of neurons in mechanical pain in (Osteen et al., 2016). Figure Download asset Open asset S1P activates thermal nociceptors but not mechanonociceptors. (A) (Left) Representative of in cultured adult DRG neurons from one S1pr3mCherry/+ (Right) Quantification of % of total cells expressing S1pr3 from DRG ISH and from DRG cultures (N = 2 animals (B) Representative from calcium imaging showing two neurons, one which to 1 µM S1P, 1 µM and and one which only to (C) (Left) calcium imaging (left) and after addition of 1 µM S1P in S1pr3 cultured mouse DRG neurons. Bar (Right) % of neurons that are to 1 µM S1P in ratiometric calcium imaging (n > cells from imaging from animals). (D) of mean neuronal calcium to of S1P. and (N = 2 animals). Error bars represent mean ± SD. for all S1P from which EC50 was S1P were also (E) trace of a single wild-type neuron in response to addition of 1 µM S1P and 1 µM with of to S1P and one of one also to Bar = 2 (F) (Left) calcium imaging after addition of 500 nM in S1pr3mCherry/+ neurons, which were used instead of adult DRG neurons because to without (Right) % of neurons that are (N = 1 total S1PR3 KCNQ2/3 channels to excitability We next the molecular by which S1P signaling in nociceptors may mechanical pain. We performed on the medium-diameter S1pr3mCherry/+ DRG neurons = ± which did not display calcium influx (Figure In these cells, 1 µM S1P did not (Figure supplement 1A; see Figure data or in the of injection (Figure supplement 1A; Figure However, S1P the threshold to in an S1PR3-dependent (Figure Figure supplement 1B). Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all Download asset Open asset S1PR3 KCNQ2/3 channels to experiments were performed in S1pr3mCherry/+ or DRG neurons. (A) (Left) of a single in cell and after S1P (Right) % in after S1P for S1pr3mCherry/+ (left, n = 7) and KO (right, n = 12) neurons = two-tailed paired t-tests). (B) % in input after S1P or vehicle two-tailed paired t-test; n = cells per group). (C) The is by The was by of the from the and at n = cells. Data were with a and were measured at the indicated to 20 following a was using the of the after to indicated indicated all bars represent mean ± (D) of a single neuron in cell comparing pre- and using indicated of a single neuron in cell with was in % in after indicated µM S1P, 3 µM or for S1pr3mCherry/+ medium-diameter one-way ANOVA; n = using at % in after indicated = 100 µM for S1pr3mCherry/+ medium-diameter two-tailed paired t-test; n = Figure data 1 S1PR3 KCNQ2/3 channels to Related to Figure Download We then set out to the by which S1PR3 activity neuronal excitability using studies showed that S1P capsaicin-sensitive nociceptors by sodium and potassium et al., 2006; Li et al., 2015). We found that S1P had no such effects on S1PR3+ medium-diameter cells (Figure supplement By contrast, S1P triggered a in input (Figure with the closure of potassium channels. analysis revealed that the by S1P was by potassium (Figure Additionally, S1P significantly reduced (Figure supplement 1F; Figure in an S1PR3-dependent (Figure supplement As in Aδ neurons are primarily mediated by KCNQ2/3 potassium channels et al., et al., we that S1P may modulation of these channels. Furthermore, the of the