Abstract
Abstract Background Low muscle mass with or without fat mass is a main component of cachexia in heart failure (HF) and associated with poor prognosis. There is a paucity of data, however, regarding prognostic impact of each component of body composition (i.e., muscle, fat, and bone mass). Purpose We hypothesized that muscle, fat, and bone mass have different impact on prognosis in HF. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 418 patients admitted with a diagnosis of HF (71±13 years, 59% male, 46 and 54% with preserved/mid-range (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40%) and reduced (<40%) LVEF), respectively). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed at stable state after decongestion therapy. Results Mean appendicular skeletal mass index (ASMI) was 6.9±1.2 kg/m2 in men and 5.6±0.9 in women, so that 55% of patients had low muscle mass categorized by the Asian Working Group of Sarcopenia. During median follow-up of 502 days, 163 (39.0%) patients experienced primary outcome defined as death or heart failure hospitalization. Using optimal cut-off of each body component chosen on the basis of a receiver operating characteristic curve and the Youden method, we demonstrated that lower ASMI defined by the cut-off of 6.5 kg/m2 in male and 5.2 in female (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.768, 95% CI: 1.210–2.581, p=0.003) and bone mass (adjusted HR: 1.498, 95% CI: 1.051–2.152, p=0.025), but not lower fat mass (p=0.34), were associated with elevated risk of primary outcome after multivariate adjustment. Kaplan-Meier curves with p value by Log-rank test were shown in figure. In subgroup analysis, negative impact of lower ASMI was significant regardless of sex and LVEF category, whereas negative impact of low bone mass was significant only in 78 female patients with reduced LVEF. Figure 1 Conclusions Indices about muscle and bone mass rather than fat mass had prognostic impact in HF. The impact of each body component may different according to sex and LVEF.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: European Heart Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.