211 Evaluation of Beef Heifer Variability in the Ability to Eat and Digest a High Forage Diet

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated beef heifers selected for high or low digestible fiber intake (DFI) and investigated its relationship with methane production, residual feed intake (RFI), and total tract digestibility. Sixteen recently weaned black Angus beef heifers (n = 8/treatment) were selected from a group 64 heifers (224 ± 17.2 kg) fed a high forage-based diet [70% barley silage:30% pelleted concentrate (DM basis)]. The 64 heifers were fed in 6 outdoor pens equipped with GrowSafe bunks to monitor feed intake for 60 d (14 d adaptation + 46 d for data collection). Individual fecal samples and BW, and feed samples were taken once weekly. Fecal samples were pooled by animal. Feed and fecal samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), and undigested neutral detergent fiber (uNDF) content. The internal marker uNDF was used to estimate total tract diet DM and NDF digestibility. The 8 heifers with the greatest and the 8 with the least digestible NDF intake (g/kg BW0.75) were selected and used for methane measurements using the GreenFeed system (42 d) and in a total-tract digestibility trial with total fecal and urine collection using the same high forage based diet. Results from the GrowSafe selection trial indicated no differences between the average BW of low and high DFI heifers (264 vs. 274 kg, P = 0.20). Heifers selected for high DFI had greater (P < 0.01) DM and NDF intake (kg/d or % of BW), and digestibility (49.6 vs. 42.1% NDF digestibility). The heifer groups differed in RFI (P < 0.01), with high DFI categorized as inefficient (+0.84 RFI) and low DFI as efficient (-0.34 RFI). No differences in ADG were observed between low and high DFI heifers during this short 46 d study period (0.614 vs 0.773, P = 0.16). High DFI heifers had lower methane production than low DFI heifers (15.9 vs. 19.0 g/kg of DMI, P = 0.02). The results of the total-tract digestibility trial showed that the high DFI heifers had a greater DMI compared with the low DFI heifers (10.9 vs. 10.2 kg/d; P = 0.04). The DMI intake was not different between groups when expressed as a % of BW (2.06 vs 2.04, P = 0.65). There was also no difference observed for DM digestibility (73.0 vs 73.1%) between the two groups. It is important to note that in the digestibility study, the DMI was less than in the GrowSafe selection trial (2.5 vs 3.2% BW) and this may have influenced results. Heifers with high DFI were heavier than low DFI heifers (533 vs. 505, P = 0.02) during the digestibility trial. Results suggest that selecting heifers for high DFI may increase growth rate and reduce methane production.