207 Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Abstract Introduction While an increasing number of studies substantiate the non-inferiority of laparoscopy to open surgery for pT4 colon cancer, studies investigating its value specific to the subgroup pT4a in right hemicolectomies remain scarce. Method We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in National University Hospital of Singapore of patients who underwent a right hemicolectomy for pT4 colon cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi square/fisher exact. Results In total, 65 patients had T4 colon cancer. 55 underwent right hemicolectomy and 10 underwent extended right hemicolectomy. Baseline demographics were similar in laparoscopic (n = 27) and open (n = 38) groups, with no significant difference in proportion of pT4a patients (p = 0.724). For pT4, 30-day mortality (7%, 5% respectively, p = 0.723), overall survival (p = 0.1903) and disease-free survival (p = 0.3476) did not differ significantly between laparoscopic and open groups. R0 resection rates were significantly higher in laparoscopic group (p = 0.039). pT4a subgroup analysis found similar observations. Other complications including postoperative wound infection and anastomotic bleed were not significantly different for both T4 and T4a analysis. Conclusions This study presented comparable safety and oncological outcomes between the two surgical methods for right hemicolectomy, suggesting laparoscopy to be a viable alternative approach for locally advanced right colon cancer.