207 Accuracy of Reviewing NELA Operation Data Entry in Emergency Laparotomy

Abstract

Abstract Aim The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) is part of the National Clinical Audit and data can often be submitted by a non-surgical clinician who do not perform the procedure, whereas operating notes are written mostly by the primary surgeon. A concern for possible discrepancies prompted a comparison between the operation notes and the NELA audit data, to assess for accuracy and understanding of the NELA inclusion/exclusion criteria. Method Operation data was collected retrospectively from the NELA database from January to December 2020. The surgeon's operation notes were reviewed and compared. Main parameters compared included ‘indication of surgery’, ‘main operation procedure’, ‘operative findings', ‘peritoneal contamination’ and ‘level of contamination’. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for NELA audit was also assessed and compared. A further questionnaire survey was performed to review the understanding of the procedure Results Total of 171 data was retrieved from the NELA database from the selected time-period. Out of these, 4.6% fulfilled the exclusion criteria. ‘Indication of operation’ were not consistent in 14 entries while in Operation procedure 4.9%. ‘Main operative findings’ were inconsistent in 11% cases. The Survey showed surgical difference in reviewing the operation notes. Conclusions There were significant portion of discrepancies between the surgical operating notes and NELA data entry when compared, due to retrospective entry and two different clinicians. There is a lack of clear understanding for the inclusion/exclusion criteria. We would like to recommend that the primary surgeon who performs the procedure records both the operating notes and the NELA data entry.