Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of haematological malignancies with extremely variable biologic, genetic and clinical characteristics.1 The outcome of MDS patients is very heterogeneous, some having a near-normal life expectancy while others die within a few months of their diagnosis. The median age of patients at diagnosis is advanced, ranging between 70 and 75 years, thus further complicating the management of these complex syndromes, since non-haematological comorbidities frequently coexist in the elderly and tolerability of treatments is limited.2 Given the heterogeneity of the disease pathobiology and the highly variable disease course, prognostic risk stratification is of crucial importance in clinical decision-making.3 To drive appropriate counselling and individualisation of treatment decisions, several prognostic scoring systems based on clinical and haematological parameters have been developed. Principal scoring systems currently used in Europe are the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), and the revised IPSS (R-IPSS), which are based on the evaluation of peripheral blood cytopenias, bone marrow blast count and cytogenetic features.4 In daily practice, reliability of these scores is limited by the variability of morphological evaluation and, less frequently, by non-informative cytogenetic findings in a proportion of patients. Moreover, other factors including the clonal mutational status have been reported to influence the prognosis of MDS patients, and to affect the clinical outcome.5, 6 In any case, diagnostic procedures and evaluation of prognosis are not covered by these guidelines as they will be published in a separate British Society for Haematology (BSH) document. Unlike the previous edition, the 2021 BSH guidelines also do not include recommendations for CMML, for which dedicated guidelines will follow. The 2021 updated BSH guidelines for the Management of Adult Myelodysplastic Syndromes provide clear, simple and practical recommendations to approach patients with such a challenging diagnosis.7 Given the heterogeneity of the disease, the importance of establishing an individual risk-adapted treatment strategy is crucial; nonetheless, transfusion requirements and infectious complications are common to almost all patients, sooner or later. The guidelines first exhaustively describe the supportive measures that should be adopted with most patients; in particular, recommendations are reported the for prevention of fungal infection, a common complication in neutropenic patients, and for transfusion thresholds and policies to be adopted to improve patient quality of life (QoL) on the one hand, saving blood products on the other. Then, individual planning of therapeutic options is described extensively, also by means of simplified algorithms. Although standard care for MDS is constantly changing, recommendations for the initial treatment choice are still based on IPSS and R-IPSS risk evaluation, and, importantly, on patient’s preference. Therapeutic measures for most lower risk patients aim to decrease the transfusion burden and improve QoL, whereas recommendations for higher risk patients aim to prolong their life. This distinction is clearly represented in these guidelines; for each group updated treatment strategies are reported, some reflecting the 2014 BSH document. Still relevant is the recommendation that the initial MDS diagnosis should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team, including a transplantation expert, as allogeneic transplantation remains the only potentially curative option. Worthy of note, in this setting recommendations for cytoreduction in advanced MDS with hypomethylating agents (HMA) or chemotherapy before transplant are still debated, although inferior survival outcomes for patients with excess BM blasts (> 5%) at the time of transplant have been reported. Moreover, it is important that clinicians review MDS cases regularly in multidisciplinary meetings to determine if a patient can become a possible transplant candidate and/or can possibly take part in a clinical trial. Patients’ details should also be made available to national and international dedicated registries, ‘to maximize information about the patient’s history and treatment of MDS in order to benefit future patients’. In general, the guidelines are proposed to improve the quality of care of patients as well as to help physicians in their daily practice. The BSH guidelines for the management of MDS represent a timely update and make a valid contribution for the diagnosis and treatment of this heterogeneous group of blood disorders.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call