Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the appropriateness of the standards of language art section of the 2015 Korean Language Curriculum. In doing so, 104 Korean teachers evaluated the standard under three heads; the content validity, the clarity of expression, the hierarchy of the contents standards. Then, the result were analyzed into system of content of 2015 Korean Language National Curriculum; (1) Nature, (2) Discourse / Text type, & Media, (3) Element, Process, & Strategy, (4) Attitude. However some newly-organized standards were under ‘validityʹ because of the difficulty of instruction and evaluation. First, the standard of Nature category showed under the clarity of expression. Second, the standard of Discourse/Text type were appropriate than other category. Third, the newly-standard of Element, Process, & Strategy category were under appropriateness. Lastly, the standard of Attitude category were appropriate than Nature category.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
