Abstract

The First Year Seminar in Science (SCIE113) was developed during 2009/2010 academic year through an exemplary collaboration between faculty, administrators and educational support staff in the Faculty of Science at the University of British Columbia (UBC). SCIE113 reflects the vision and values of the Faculty of Science and UBC by offering an enriched educational experience to its first year students. The small class format provides students an intimate connection with faculty, an opportunity for significant engagement early in their academic careers, and helps with transitioning to the university environment.The overall goal of SCIE113 is to introduce skills that cross disciplinary boundaries and that every scientist and student in science must master: how to constructively build an evidence-based argument and how to communicate effectively. The overarching course goals are to define and discuss the elements of a scientific approach, to think like a scientist, and to communicate science through writing. SCIE113 fosters the development of authentic scientific scholars through the construction, integration, and use of argumentation skills and through an exploration of science as a way of knowing using a collaborative class environment. SCIE113 engages students in interactive and collaborative activities and promotes learning of scientific argumentation and writing skills. In-class and out-of-class activities allow students to frequently discuss, debate, and defend their views of science. Specific learning activities such as case studies, targeted readings, and examinations of media and scientific articles allow students to evaluate the validity of scientific claims and to construct a scientific argument. Meanwhile, activities such as reflections, in-class writing, peer review, and discussions on the fundamentals of writing help students to improve their writing skills which are assessed by three short essays and a term project. The guided peer review process, which fosters collaboration, enables students to provide expert-like feedback to their peers. Faculty and TA feedback completes the review process. SCIE113 is an exemplary model of collaboration and is guided by best practices in instructional design.SCIE113 is a model of collaborative course design and instruction with a large, multi-disciplinary teaching team. The design of SCIE113 is guided by best practices and continues to evolve in response to emerging research. The teaching team consists of faculty and teaching assistants from 14 different departments, representing four Faculties, with a wide range of expertise and experience in fostering student learning. The teaching team meets bi-weekly to cultivate reflective practice and to support faculty in their professional development for teaching this writing intensive course.SCIE113 is informed by the scholarship of teaching and learning.SCIE113 is informed by comprehensive research that is incorporated into course design and implementation and utilizes validated assessment tools. Frequent feedback from students and faculty, and measures of perceived and actual learning gains, ensure successful course implementation and promote student learning.

Highlights

  • The overall goal of SCIE113 is to introduce skills that cross disciplinary boundaries and that every scientist and student in science must master: how to constructively build an evidencebased argument and how to communicate effectively

  • In-class and out-of-class activities allow students to frequently discuss, debate, and defend their views of science. Specific learning activities such as case studies, targeted readings, and examinations of media and scientific articles allow students to evaluate the validity of scientific claims and to construct a scientific argument. Activities such as reflections, in-class writing, peer review, and discussions on the fundamentals of writing help students to improve their writing skills which are assessed by three short essays and a term project

  • Discussion of Faculty-specific needs for a small first year seminar began in 2009 with small committee led by Lacey Samuels

Read more

Summary

Levels of Collaboration

Motivated by the need to improve science students’ critical thinking and communication skills, faculty, administrators, and educational support staff began to collaborate on the design of the. First Year Seminar in Science in 2009 This collaboration led to an ongoing cycle of development, delivery, and evaluation. Course development meetings between faculty and the Dean’s Office led to the commitment of the Science Centre for Learning and Teaching to assist with on-going course development, evaluation and research. Biweekly meetings with the instructional team provide a venue for teaching collaborations including an exchange of ideas, rich discussions content and professional development opportunities. With evolving course content and a commitment to ongoing evaluation, regular engagement with administration, the instructional team and students is key to ensuring the success and sustainment of the program. Regular student feedback informs the ongoing course development and students are engaged to assist with the development and evaluation resources

Institutional Context
Goals of Project
Science as a way of knowing
Presenting scientific arguments
Evidence in a scientific world view
Science and the global citizen
Course Overview
Research Plan
Perceived Learning Gains
Actual Learning Gains
Future developments
Course Design
Teaching Practices
Findings
Assessment and Evaluation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call