Abstract

Background:The triad of symptom groups of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) encompasses cognitive impairment (e.g. impaired memory or orientation), neuropsychiatric symptoms like apathy, depressive mood, delusions, hallucinations or anxiety, and functional impairment exclusively in complex activities of daily living (cADL, e.g. preparing meals, managing finances) in minor neurocognitive disorder due to AD and both in complex and basic ADL (bADL, e.g. dressing, toileting) in major neurocognitive disorder due to AD. These functional impairments are widely thought to be exclusively attributable to the cognitive deficits of the disease. Of note, mounting evidence indicates that neuropsychiatric symptoms are very common in AD and pose a heavy burden to both patients and their caregivers.Research objective:To unravel potential associations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and cADL and bADL in individuals with neurocognitive disorder due to AD by means of machine learning (ML).Methods:The study included 189 cognitively intact older individuals (CI) and 130 with either minor or major neurocognitive disorder due to AD. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were captured with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), covering delusions, hallucinations, aggression, depression, anxiety, apathy, elation, disinhibition, irritability, motor disturbance, nighttime behavioural disturbances and appetite disturbances; cognitive function was assessed with the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL); The Bristol ADL scale, an informant-rated measure, was employed for tapping performance of ADL. A variety of ML-models was constructed and trained/tested using a 5-fold cross validation, with SMOTE employed as a remedy for class imbalances. In all cases the features had been selected beforehand based on LASSO technique. The dependent variable was either cADL or bADL (after their discretization based on kMeans quantization). Additionally, the modelling of the diagnosis was also attempted within our ML framework.Results:Gradient Boosting models performed superiorly. cADL and bADL levels are predicted based on both deficits in cognitive domains and NPI variables with an accuracy of 82.3% and 84.8% respectively.In addition, diagnosis can be predicted, with an accuracy of 83.5%, based on a model in which NPI and Bristol ADL variables were significant predictors.Conclusions:cADL- and bADL performance in patients with AD is influenced by both cognitive deficits and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call