2 Satellite-Based Decision Support Tools to Assist Grazing Cattle Production

Abstract

Abstract Grasslands cover approximately 40.5% of the surface of the earth and 80% of agriculturally productive land. After forests, grasslands are the primary carbon sink source and the most used feed source for livestock production. Regularly monitoring grasslands assures efficient management and sustainability of pasture-based production systems. Conventional ground-based methods to monitor grassland production and management rely on field measurements, which are time-consuming and usually restricted to small-scale assessment. Using satellite information allows for large-scale monitoring of grasslands and capturing the spatial variability of the land surface with high temporal resolution. Various methods for grassland monitoring based on satellite data can be applied, such as classifications, correlations/regression analyses, and time series analyses. Depending on the purpose of the application, these methods are sometimes combined to derive grassland management and production information. The ability of satellite-based data to quantify vegetation characteristics depends on the type of sensor and instrumentation features, such as spectral, radiometric, spatial, and temporal resolution, polarization, and angularity. The models to estimate grassland biomass based on remote sensing have been chiefly focused on optical systems. The spectral reflectance of raw bands and vegetation indices were used as proxies to investigate spatial and temporal patterns of grassland production. Optical (multispectral or hyperspectral) sensors are passive and require sunlight, so they depend highly on the weather (cloud) and light conditions. Thus, there has been increasing interest in active sensors, such as Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) sensors, which are not constrained due to clouds but are more complex. Using satellite data in combination with field measurements has commonly yielded regression models (e.g., linear, power, logarithmic, multiple linear) for estimating grassland biomass or biophysical characteristics (e.g., chlorophyll, leaf area index) of different types of grasslands. The exponential evolution of digital computers has pushed forward machine learning-based regression methods to estimate biomass. Random forest, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks are the most used algorithms. The possibility of accurate mapping and monitoring of biomass and nutritional attributes of grasslands based on satellite provides essential insights into the decision support system for pasture management. A better understanding of the nitrogen status of pastures, forage biomass, and its nutritive value is instrumental in livestock and forage management. Timely prediction of these variables can help improve decision-making by grazing land managers on, for instance, the adjustment of stocking rate or adequate supplementation to match the needs of animals toward more sustainable production. Future use of satellite-based grazing models in tandem with ruminant nutrition models will enable to development of decision-support tools to assist with many aspects of livestock production in diverse environmental conditions and accounting for temporal variability. (FAPESP #2020/14367-7)