Abstract

Most articulated robots comprise multiple joints and links that control the position and posture of the end effector. The kinematic pair arrangement determines characteristics such as output force. The link configurations can be classified as serial link and parallel link mechanisms. A typical parallel link mechanism is the spherical parallel mechanism (SPM), designed to ensure that the end effector has only rotational degrees of freedom. However, the kinematic pair arrangement has not been sufficiently examined in two degrees of freedom (2-DOF) SPMs. Herein, we present a basic design method for the proposed 2-DOF SPM curved biaxial swing mechanism, with inputs comprising arc sliders. The swinging area of the passive link was small, and infinite rotation around a certain axis was achieved without collision or transfer to a singular posture. Using the kinematics of this mechanism, we clarified the linear roll output and non-linear pitch output. Moreover, we fabricated a prototype and measured its basic drive characteristics. The results revealed that the output performance was greatly dependent on the rotation angle, high movable range in the roll axis, and low movable range in the pitch axis.

Highlights

  • M OST articulated robots, such as robotic arms, comprise multiple links and joints that control the position and posture of the end effector

  • We propose a novel two degrees of freedom (2-DOF) spherical parallel mechanism (SPM), as shown in Fig. 1, called a curved biaxial swing mechanism

  • This study aims to 1) construct a basic design method for 8R slider type 2-DOF SPM capable of infinite rotation in the roll direction without transition to a singular point and 2) measure its basic driving characteristics using a prototype

Read more

Summary

Introduction

M OST articulated robots, such as robotic arms, comprise multiple links and joints that control the position and posture of the end effector. The kinematic pair arrangement should be initially considered, as it determines. Manuscript received October 16, 2020; accepted February 14, 2021. Date of publication March 8, 2021; date of current version April 13, 2021. This letter was recommended for publication by Associate Editor X. Gosselin upon evaluation of the reviewers’ comments. (Naoto Saiki, Kenjiro Tadakuma and Masahiro Watanabe contributed to this work.) (Corresponding author: Kenjiro Tadakuma.)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call