Abstract

AbstractThe oxidative addition of (2,2‐dibromovinyl)ferrocene [Br2C=C(H)–Fc] (1) to [Pd(PPh3)4] yields the heterodinuclear σ‐alkenyl complex trans‐[{Pd(Br)(PPh3)2}–C(Br)=C(H)–Fc] (2). Nucleophilic attack of sodium thiolates on 1 unexpectedly affords the vinyl thioether derivatives (Z)‐[(RS)(H)C=C(H)–Fc] (4a: R = Ph; 4b: R = tBu; 4c: R = Et). Complexes 4a and 4c can also be prepared by addition of NaSR across the triple bond of Fc–C≡C–H (3). Addition of an excess of NaSR to 1 affords the dithioether derivatives (Z)‐[(RS)(H)C=C(SR)–Fc] (5a: R = Ph; 5b: R = p‐tolyl; 5c: R = Et). An addition/elimination sequence is suggested to account for this surprising result. The yield of 5c is very low due to a competing formation of ethynylferrocene (3). Reaction of 5b with [Re(thf)(CO)3(μ‐Br)]2 and [PtCl2(PhCN)2] leads to the heterodinuclear chelate complexes [Fc{C(S–p‐tolyl)=C(H)(S–p‐tolyl)}Re(Br)(CO)3] (6) and [Fc{C(S–p‐tolyl)=C(H)(S–p‐tolyl)}PtCl2] (7a), respectively. Metathesis of the fluxional compound 7a in the presence of NaI affords [Fc{C(S–p‐tolyl)=C(H)(S–p‐tolyl)}PtI2] (7b). The electrochemical properties of some of these complexes have been studied by means of cyclic voltammetry, and the molecular structures of 1, 2, 3, 4b, 4c and 6 have been determined by X‐ray diffraction. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2007)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.