Abstract

The characterization of T. vulgaris plant material for quality control purposes was performed by NMR-based methods. Direct extraction of 141 T. vulgaris samples with DMSO-d 6 enabled the obtainment of crude extracts with a representative composition in terms of both volatile and non-volatile constituents. The acquisition of 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra resulted in a dataset which was analyzed by a combination of metabolic profiling and target analysis approaches. Preliminary analysis of the 1H NMR spectra was performed by principal component analysis, which revealed sample discrimination on a chemotype basis (thymol, carvacrol and linalool chemotypes). Further minor discriminative constituents were identified as p-cymene, γ-terpinene, rosmarinic acid, and 3,4,3′,4′-tetrahydroxy-5,5′-diisopropyl-2,2′-dimethylbiphenyl. Metabolite identification was accomplished by 1D and 2D NMR techniques and supported by spiking experiments. Fast dereplication of constituents not available as reference compounds was performed by HPLC–SPE–NMR experiments. A targeted approach based on qHNMR was validated for quantification of the identified secondary metabolites. Validation was performed in terms of precision (intra-day RSD ≤ 4.51%, inter-day RSD ≤ 4.18%), repeatability (RSD ≤ 2.30%), accuracy (recovery rates within 93.4 and 103.4%), linearity (correlation coefficients ≥ 0.9990), robustness, and stability. The amount of the dominant monoterpene in thymol, carvacrol, and linalool chemotypes was respectively found to be within 0.4–2.6, 0.7–2.3, and 1.1–3.6% (w/w). Variable amounts of the precursors p-cymene and γ-terpinene were found in thymol and carvacrol chemotypes. The highest amount of rosmarinic acid and 3,4,3′,4′-tetrahydroxy-5,5′-diisopropyl-2,2′-dimethylbiphenyl in the analyzed samples was respectively 4.6 and 0.4% (w/w). Since quantification is performed on a weight basis, the essential oil content can be estimated based on the sum of the quantified monoterpenes. The NMR-based analysis of T. vulgaris represents a more comprehensive approach in comparison to traditional chromatographic methods such as GC and LC, respectively employed for the analysis of volatile and non-volatile constituents. Further advantages lie in the simple sample preparation, rapidity and reproducibility of the NMR analysis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call