Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the strong connections between the topics of this special volume of Religions: the current crisis of political Catholicism and religious Catholicism; the new questions posed about the relationship between Catholicism and advanced modernization; the relationship between Catholicism and European institutions; and the importance of the North Atlantic relationships within Catholicism. The paper sheds light on these questions through an analysis of a particular but indicative case study, namely, the “Catholic 68” in Italy. Deconstructing the predominant narrative about the relationship between Vatican II and the events of 1968 (or, better, those of the 2-year period 1967–1969) helps to clarify the connections between the topics of this volume in important ways. In fact, the predominant narrative about the “Catholic 68” still pays undue tribute to both an oversimplified reconstruction of the “parties” who fought one another during the Second Vatican Council and an oversimplified reading of the late 1960s. In this perspective, the Italian case is particularly relevant and yields important sociological insight. The starting point of the paper is the abundant literature on the “long 60s”. This scholarship has clarified the presence of an important religious dimension to the social and cultural processes of this period as well as a (generally accepted) link between the Council-issued renewal and “1968”. At the same time that literature has also clarified that the “long 60s” paved the way for a deep social transition which has also marked the first two decades of the 21st century. The nature of this religious renewal and social change has often been described as the triumph of liberal parties over conservative parties. This paper instead proposes a “three parties scheme” (conservative, progressive and liberal) to better understand the confrontation that occurred at the Council and that at the end of the same decade and its consequences for Catholicism and European politics today.

Highlights

  • Catholicism is in crisis today, and in Central-Western Europe

  • On the basis of all this, we will try to demonstrate that, in the 2-year period of 1967–1969, numerous orientations regarding the relationship between Catholicism and society emerged, and that these orientations can be better understood if put in relationship with the events of Vatican II

  • The identity crisis represented by Vatican II, including its delays and uncertainties, was insufficient to prevent the liveliest part of the Catholic world from joining the protest movements of those years, which ended up acting against the Catholic institutions themselves

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Catholicism is in crisis today, and in Central-Western Europe. Italy—which this paper will focus on—does not represent an exception (Vezzoni and Biolcati-Rinaldi 2015). On the basis of all this, we will try to demonstrate that, in the 2-year period of 1967–1969, numerous orientations regarding the relationship between Catholicism and society emerged, and that these orientations can be better understood if put in relationship with the events of Vatican II (which ended in 1965) This includes both the first stage of application and reception of the Council’s resolutions and the Catholic criticism about modernity and modernization that already during the 1950s had both a rightist and a leftist declination. A second group of authors, instead, supports an indirect relationship between Vatican II and “1968”4 In this interpretation, the identity crisis represented by Vatican II, including its delays and uncertainties, was insufficient to prevent the liveliest part of the Catholic world from joining the protest movements of those years, which ended up acting against the Catholic institutions themselves (both religious and nonreligious). With more costs than benefits, it tends to postpone the analytical work on Vatican II and on its relationship with the 1967–1969 biennial

Broadening Our View on the “Long 60s”
Findings
Some Analytical Advantages of a Different Interpretation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call