Abstract

Why were Western paintings considered ”without stroke order” or ”lifeless” by Chinese scholars before the 18(superscript th) century? Why did the court painters/missionaries during the reign of Emperor Qianlong have misunderstandings with Chinese painters on the question of ”shadows”? Why did Chinese painters around the time of the ”New Culture Movement” define Western paintings as ”realistic”? This paper is to present the ”cross-cultural context” formed by the interflow between Chinese and Western arts from days of the ”New Culture Movement” to 1937 as well as the construction of self-identity and the formation of knowledge of modern Chinese aesthetics and art in this context. From all these things emerged two paths: the advocates of ”fine-art revolution” invoked the ”realism” and ”science” of Western painting to criticize traditional pieces, while the guardians of ”national legacy” employed Western fine art as reference framework to make a renewed legitimate statement about their own tradition and form a complicated mechanism of ”discourse-knowledge” construction. In the end, it turns out that evolution of the modernity of Chinese fine art started in the altering gazes of the Chinese ”mind nature” and the Western ”eyes.”

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call