1908 Documentation in Clinical Frailty scores in patients aged >65 admitted to surgical assessment unit

Abstract

Abstract Introduction According to the latest NELA report, frailty doubles the risk of mortality in patients >65 and above, but review by a geriatrician can significantly reduce this risk. To identify patients at risk, the report recommended that a formal frailty assessment for all patients>65 should be performed. The aim of this audit was to check compliance with this recommendation. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from a prospectively maintained electronic hospital records. Patients > 65 years admitted acutely under general surgery were identified from handover lists spanning a period of two weeks. The admission documents were reviewed to check for a formal assessment of clinical frailty score (CFS) had been completed. Following initial results, posters were put up in the SAU doctors’ office and all clerking doctors made aware via e-mails, WhatsApp groups and teaching to complete a CFS for patients >65 years. Results In the first cycle, 50 patients were identified and compliance rate was 18%. Following intervention, 51 patients were identified in the subsequent cycle with a compliance rate of 47%. After a second intervention, 99 patients were identified with a compliance rate of 61%. Discussion The NELA report highlighted only 23% of patients had a CFS documented and this was similar to the results of the initial audit. The main reason was lack of awareness, which was addressed by creating an awareness among the colleagues via poster, group chats and emails. This brought compliance up to 47%. Another reason was doctors being unable to locate the CFS on the electronic clerking document. A second round of intervention by poster, group chat, email communication and teaching achieved a 61% completion rate. The recommendation is to continue to improve the documentation of CFS further and utilize this to get input from geriatricians.