Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the utility of [18F]FDG-PET as an imaging biomarker for pathological response early upon neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) before surgery.MethodsIn the IMCISION trial (NCT03003637), 32 patients with stage II‒IVb HNSCC were treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab with (n = 26) or without (n = 6) ipilimumab (weeks 1 and 3) before surgery (week 5). [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans were acquired at baseline and shortly before surgery in 21 patients. Images were analysed for SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Major and partial pathological responses (MPR and PPR, respectively) to immunotherapy were identified based on the residual viable tumour in the resected primary tumour specimen (≤ 10% and 11–50%, respectively). Pathological response in lymph node metastases was assessed separately. Response for the 2 [18F]FDG-PET-analysable patients who did not undergo surgery was determined clinically and per MR-RECIST v.1.1. A patient with a primary tumour MPR, PPR, or primary tumour MR-RECIST-based response upon immunotherapy was called a responder.ResultsMedian ΔSUVmax, ΔSUVmean, ΔMTV, and ΔTLG decreased in the 8 responders and were significantly lower compared to the 13 non-responders (P = 0.05, P = 0.002, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001). A ΔMTV or ΔTLG of at least − 12.5% detected a primary tumour response with 95% accuracy, compared to 86% for the EORTC criteria. None of the patients with a ΔTLG of − 12.5% or more at the primary tumour site developed a relapse (median FU 23.0 months since surgery). Lymph node metastases with a PPR or MPR (5 metastases in 3 patients) showed a significant decrease in SUVmax (median − 3.1, P = 0.04). However, a SUVmax increase (median + 2.1) was observed in 27 lymph nodes (in 11 patients), while only 13 lymph nodes (48%) contained metastases in the corresponding neck dissection specimen.ConclusionsPrimary tumour response assessment using [18F]FDG-PET-based ΔMTV and ΔTLG accurately identifies pathological responses early upon neoadjuvant ICB in HNSCC, outperforming the EORTC criteria, although pseudoprogression is seen in neck lymph nodes. [18F]FDG-PET could, upon validation, select HNSCC patients for response-driven treatment adaptation in future trials.Trial registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT03003637, December 28, 2016.

Highlights

  • Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) leads to objective responses in 13–17% of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and significantly improves their overall survival compared to chemotherapy [1, 2]

  • Our group has recently demonstrated that HNSCC patients with an early primary tumour pathological response to neoadjuvant ICB are accompanied by a decrease in primary tumour total lesion glycolysis (TLG) assessed per [­18F]FDG-PET in a 4-week timeframe [7]

  • We report in detail on the ­[18F]FDG-PET scans acquired in the context of the IMCISION trial, wherein patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC were treated with two cycles of nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab plus ipilimumab before definitive surgery [7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) leads to objective responses in 13–17% of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and significantly improves their overall survival compared to chemotherapy [1, 2]. Our group has recently demonstrated that none of the HNSCC patients with an MPR after neoadjuvant dual ICB has developed a tumour relapse, significantly superior to patients without an MPR [7]. While these results warrant validation, they could challenge the necessity of mutilating and functionally impairing surgery [8] and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, and provide a rationale to investigate the feasibility of withholding or de-escalating standard-of-care in patients with a deep pathological response early upon neoadjuvant ICB. We aim to describe the manifestations of metabolic response, metabolic progression, and metabolic pseudoprogression after neoadjuvant ICB and explore [­ 18F]FDG-PET scanning’s ability to predict pathological response early upon immunotherapy in patients with resectable HNSCC

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.