Abstract
Coincidence imaging with a dual-head gamma camera may offer a cost-effective alternative to dedicated PET. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of coincidence imaging and PET in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Thirty-one patients were studied after thyroidectomy and radioiodine ablation. They were injected with a single dose of 300 MBq 18F-FDG. Scanning was performed on a dedicated PET system after 1 hr, and on a coincidence gamma camera after 4 hrs. Based on a lesion-by-lesion comparison, coincidence imaging and PET concurred in 69% of 118 lesions. Based on lesion size, concurrence was 96% in lesions larger than 1.5 cm, and 62% in those between 1 and 1.5 cm. Lesions smaller than 1 cm could not be identified with coincidence imaging. Identical staging was obtained with coincidence imaging and PET in 26/31 patients (84%). In four patients FDG accumulating lesions were shown by both the coincidence camera and the dedicated scanner, but not detectable with any other imaging means and were confirmed histologically on surgery. Although a coincidence camera is technically inferior to a dedicated PET scanner, it may provide clinically useful results in situations were a lesion of sufficient size and FDG uptake is to be expected, e.g. when evaluating a known lesion for malignancy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
