#1899 Transitional care clinic for incident hemodialysis patients : the Singapore experience

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims The period of transition from chronic kidney disease (CKD) to End stage kidney disease (ESKD) presents significant morbidity and mortality risk to the patients. This higher mortality risk is largely contributed by cardiovascular factors and infection. The last 2 decades have seen a remarkable succession of programs to improve outcome in incident dialysis patients. One such initiative is the use of ‘fistula first’ policy. In Singapore, pre-emptive access creation among ESKD patients continues to be low, with up to 80% of incident dialysis patients being commenced on hemodialysis (HD) via a dialysis catheter. Ensuring that incident dialysis patients have definitive vascular access, early referral to transplantation and adequate psychosocial support, amongst other factors, is an important consideration in their journey towards improved health outcomes. In order to achieve this, meticulous care coordination and a multifaceted approach is required. This realization is what led to the inception of our transition care clinic (TCC) in 2019. Conducted bi-monthly by a multidisciplinary team of nephrologists and renal coordinators, with inputs from pharmacists and medical social workers as needed, the TCC engages patients within 4-6 weeks post-hospital discharge. Its focus includes vascular access, dietary and fluid compliance, blood pressure control, HD adherence, transplantation referral, and medication reconciliation. Method A retrospective analysis of 314 ESKD patients who initiated HD between September 2019 and September 2022 compared outcomes between TCC attendees (n=164) and non-attendees Results TCC attendees exhibited a lower 1- year mortality rate (p=0.002) and higher rates for vascular access creation within first 6 months (p=0.001) as compared to non-attendees. However, no statistical differences were observed in hospitalization rates in the first year (p=0.760) and kidney transplantation referrals (p=0.20) between the two groups. Conclusion While notable improvements were observed in mortality rates and vascular access creation, there was no significant difference in hospitalization rates or kidney transplantation referrals between the two groups. In spite of the limitations due to its retrospective nature, this study clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of TCC in enhancing patient outcomes during the critical initial phase of hemodialysis. The study highlights the importance of setting up, refinement and expansion of such services in improving the outcome of this vulnerable patient group.