185. Does an Infectious Diseases Consultation Improve Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Bundle Adherence for Enterococcal Bacteremia in a Multicenter Healthcare System?

Abstract

BackgroundInfectious diseases consultation (IDC) for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia has a known mortality benefit, but for other gram positive bacteremias the benefit is not known. This study examined differences in outcomes for enterococcal bacteremia when management includes IDC.MethodsThis retrospective multicenter observational cohort study included adults with at least 1 positive blood culture with Enterococcus species. Patients who died or transferred to palliative care within 2 days of positive blood cultures were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of clinical failure, including persistent blood cultures or fever for 5 days and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included adherence to a treatment bundle (appropriate empiric/definitive antibiotics, echocardiography (ECHO), duration of treatment, and repeat blood cultures).ResultsA total of 250 patients were included. IDC was obtained in 62.0% of patients. More patients in the IDC group had endocarditis (20% vs 0%, p < 0.0001) and bone and joint infections (13.5% vs 1.1%, p = 0.001), compared to more UTI (16.8% vs 39.0%, p < 0.0001) in the non-IDC group. Patients in the IDC group had more murmurs on initial exam (21.3% vs 6.3%, p = 0.002), prosthetic device (49.7% vs 27.4%, p = 0.001), and NOVA scores of ≥ 4 (40.6% vs 18.9%, p < 0.0001). Most infections were due to E. faecalis (78.4%) and most were susceptible to vancomycin and ampicillin at 90.4% and 92.4%, respectively. The composite of clinical failure occurred in 22.6% of patients with IDC and 16.8% in the non-IDC group (p=0.274). There was higher adherence to the treatment bundle in the IDC group (Figure 1). More patients in the IDC group were treated with ampicillin (47.1% vs 22.1%, p < 0.0001), and numerically more patients received treatment with vancomycin in the non-IDC group (17.4% vs 24.2%, p = 0.068). In the multivariate analysis, vasopressors were the only independent predictor of the primary outcome (OR 9.3, 95% CI 3.5-24.8, p < 0.0001). Figure 1. Adherence to treatment bundle. IDC = infectious diseases consultation, Echo = echocardiogram, * = p < 0.05 ConclusionThere was no difference in rates of composite failure in patients with or without IDC; however, adherence to a treatment bundle was higher in the IDC group. IDC demonstrated stewardship benefits with regards to vancomycin usage. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures