Abstract
Abstract Background Guidelines recommend betablockers (BB) as first line therapy in symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). A secondary role in the therapeutic algorithm is assigned to non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (ND-CCB). Since no randomized comparison trials between the two drugs have been made so far, the aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the prognostic impact of BB and ND-CCB in a cohort of patients with HCM, either obstructive or not. Methods From a cohort of 1434 patients with a diagnosis of HCM included in the French register REMY, we retrospectively analysed 601 individuals treated with BB or ND-CCB. Patients taking both BB and ND-CCB or none, patients who already had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or a pacemaker and who had already undergone a procedure of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation or of septal reduction therapy were excluded. Results Out of 601 HCM patients, 545 (91%) were treated with BB and 56 (9%) with ND-CCB. At 8-year follow-up no differences were observed as regard the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure and hospitalization for AF (133 [24%] vs. 9 [16%] for patients taking BB or ND-CCB respectively, HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.94–3.63). Patients taking ND-CCB were less symptomatic at long-term follow-up but experienced more drug interruptions or changes. Conclusions In a real-world cohort of patients with HCM, ND-CCB therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of adverse events compared to BB therapy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
