184 A National Survey of Clinicians who Assess People with Suspected Dementia: Service Characteristics and Practice

Abstract

Abstract Background The Irish National Dementia Strategy (2014) identified timely diagnosis and intervention as a priority area. The National Dementia Office established a Dementia Diagnostic Project to develop a framework for diagnostic services nationally. As part of preparatory work, a national survey explored baseline peri-diagnostic practice in geriatric medicine, neurology and psychiatry of old age services. Methods A survey was developed by the project steering group, piloted, and then distributed to all 86 Geriatricians, 39 Neurologists, and 34 Psychiatrists of Old Age Psychiatrists in Ireland. Two reminder e-mails were sent. Results In total, 56 clinicians responded (response rate 35%). The majority (74%) saw 1-20 people with suspected dementia (PwSD) per month. Most referrals came from General Practitioners or other physicians; but rarely from Health and Social Care Professionals. Most people were referred specifically for their memory complaint, rather than a co-morbidity. Waiting times for urgent review varied between 24 hours and 4 years; neurology services had the longest waiting times. Only 30% saw PwSD in a dedicated clinic; about the same proportion saw PwSD in their own home; or in residential care settings. About half reported assessing people with intellectual disability and suspected dementia, mainly the neurologists. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was the most commonly used cognitive tool (89%), followed by the Addenbrook’s Cognitive Examination (56%). Only 17% commonly used functional brain imaging in diagnosis, mainly neurologists; half of respondents ‘never’ or ‘rarely’ used cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Multidisciplinary input was mainly from Occupational Therapists (61%), Psychology/Neuropsychology (52%), and Nursing disciplines (33%). When asked which discipline would most benefit their diagnostic service, neurologists all chose psychology input; geriatricians selected a range of disciplines. Conclusion The significant variability within current services who see PwSD, in terms of multidisciplinary involvement, waiting times, setting, and supporting investigations, supports the need for a national diagnostic framework.