Abstract
Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia carries high mortality with limited treatment options. Studies over the last decade support glycolipopeptide and beta-lactam combination therapy with daptomycin (DAP) and ceftaroline (CFT) combination gaining prominence. While data supports de-escalation to monotherapy after bacteremia clearance it does not guide the choice of agent. With barriers including accessibility, cost, and tolerability of these agents, data is needed to optimize treatment. This study aims to evaluate de-escalation options after combination DAP/CFT therapy for persistent MRSA bacteremia. Methods A single-center, retrospective review of cases of persistent MRSA bacteremia (defined as greater than 72 hours on appropriate therapy) requiring escalation to DAP/CFT between 2014 and 2021 was performed. Details of bacteremia, source of infection, and comorbidities were assessed, and outcomes including recurrence of infection, infection-associated mortality, and tolerability were compared using exact Chi-square testing and univariant analysis. Results Sixty-six cases were identified of which 7 were de-escalated to vancomycin (VAN), 48 to DAP, 4 to CFT, and 7 continued DAP/CFT combination. Demographics and details of bacteremia such as prior anti-MRSA therapy, duration prior to DAP/CFT therapy, and source identification were similar between groups. Differences included higher rates of hemodialysis patients in the VAN group, higher rates of immunocompromised hosts in the DAP group, higher average Pitt bacteremia score in the DAP/CFT group, and lower rates of source control in the VAN group. Recurrence of infection (29% VAN, 13% DAP, 25% CFT) and infection-related mortality (14% VAN, 8% DAP) were higher in the VAN group (p=0.0452). In the DAP group 23% required change in therapy during their course. Univariant analysis assessing for confounding from comorbidities and source control yielded no significant associations. Conclusion This study is limited by small, uneven sample sizes but the results identify a trend of increased recurrence rates and mortality with de-escalation to VAN but tolerability concerns with DAP. More study is needed to guide clinical care and this data provides framework for future research. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.