179 The effect of competition for an automated supplement feeder on supplement intake behavior of stocker steers

Abstract

Abstract Interest in automated, precision feeding equipment is increasing, and users need information about how to effectively use this new approach. Our objective was to determine the effect of competition for a feeding space at an automated supplement feeder on supplement intake behavior. Mixed breed beef steers (n = 128, initial BW = 257 ± 29.2 kg) were randomly assigned to 8 paddocks. One paddock (16 steers) was selected to have continuous access to the feeder for the duration of the 16-wk trial; this paddock was designated the “tester” paddock. The automated feeder consisted of a large bin that dispensed supplement into 4 feeding stations. Supplement dispense was triggered by the presence of an eligible animal’s RFID tag; each steer was limited to 0.50 kg supplement/d by the electronics of the feeder. Weekly, additional paddocks were commingled with the tester paddock to increase competition for the feeder, resulting in a stocking density from 4 to 32 steers per feeding station in various weeks. Approximately 30% of the steers did not voluntarily use the feeder; therefore effective competition was less than the study design. Supplement intake and GPS location were recorded for steers in the tester paddock, and averaged for each wk; week was the experimental unit (n = 16). Weekly mean supplement intake and time spent near the feeder were regressed on feeder stocking density. Tester steers consumed an average of 0.36 kg supplement/d. Competition for a feeder space numerically reduced (P = 0.15) supplement intake by 0.002 kg/d per steer of competition. Steers spent 6% of the time within 15 m of the feeder regardless of competition (P = 0.82). This data illustrates that in scenarios similar to these experimental conditions, the feeder can be stocked with at least 80 animals with minimal effects on supplement intake.