Abstract

Abstract Background Optimal duration of empiric antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin (FN-FUO) remains controversial. Emerging evidence suggests that early discontinuation of antibiotics at 48-72 hours of apyrexia is safe regardless of neutrophil count. However, in the U.S., the adoption of this and other antibiotic use practices in these patients remains unstandardized and understudied, particularly in community hospitals. In this pilot study, we sought to evaluate current antibiotic prescription practices in our large community hospital in admitted patients with AML and FN-FUO. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 1st, 2020 to December 16th, 2021. All patients admitted with a diagnosis of AML and febrile neutropenia (FN) were screened and those with FN-FUO, defined as no microbiological growth on blood, respiratory or urine cultures at 48 hours of first fever were included. Data on initial antibiotic choices, use of vancomycin and its congruence with IDSA guidelines, mean days of therapy (DOT), mean days of “excess” therapy (DOET), defined by days of antibiotics after >72 hours of apyrexia and total DOET were obtained by medical record review and descriptive analysis was performed. Results A total of 65 patients with FN were screened. After screening, 27 patients met criteria for inclusion and data from their hospital stay was obtained (Table 1). Cefepime was the preferred choice of initial intravenous β-lactam in 85% of cases and piperacillin-tazobactam was used in the remainder of cases. Vancomycin was used initially in 55% of cases out of which its use was considered to be incongruent with IDSA guidelines in 25% of cases. The most common reason for IDSA incongruent use of vancomycin was lack of documentation for its use. Mean DOT was 10 and mean DOET was 3 (Table 2). In total, we identified 87 excess days of antibiotic therapy in this cohort. Conclusion Little is known about antibiotic prescription practices in high risk FN-FUO patients in community hospitals. Our findings highlight potential concrete antibiotic stewardship targets and shortening this knowledge gap may help guide the development of interventions that have been previously shown to improve clinical outcomes in this overall underrepresented population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.