1706: Why Stones Break Better at Slow Shock Wave Rate in SWL

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyPodium, Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 3:30 - 5:30 pm1 Apr 20061706: Why Stones Break Better at Slow Shock Wave Rate in SWL Yuri A. Pishchalnikov, R. Jason VonDerHaar, Irina V. Pishchalnikova, James C. Williams, and James A. McAteer Yuri A. PishchalnikovYuri A. Pishchalnikov More articles by this author , R. Jason VonDerHaarR. Jason VonDerHaar More articles by this author , Irina V. PishchalnikovaIrina V. Pishchalnikova More articles by this author , James C. WilliamsJames C. Williams More articles by this author , and James A. McAteerJames A. McAteer More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(18)33885-0AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "1706: Why Stones Break Better at Slow Shock Wave Rate in SWL." The Journal of Urology, 175(4S), pp. 548–549 © 2016 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byMancini J, Neisius A, Smith N, Sankin G, Astroza G, Lipkin M, Simmons W, Preminger G and Zhong P (2018) Assessment of a Modified Acoustic Lens for Electromagnetic Shock Wave Lithotripters in a Swine ModelJournal of Urology, VOL. 190, NO. 3, (1096-1101), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013. Volume 175Issue 4SApril 2006Page: 548-549 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information Yuri A. Pishchalnikov More articles by this author R. Jason VonDerHaar More articles by this author Irina V. Pishchalnikova More articles by this author James C. Williams More articles by this author James A. McAteer More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...