Abstract
Abstract Aim Which theories, concepts and frameworks have been evidenced for surgical innovation in leadership in the United Kingdom, European Union, and the United States of America? Method Systematic scoping synthesis of literature will be employed where appropriate theories, concepts and frameworks will be identified. Drawing upon broader literature on leadership innovation in surgery further examples will be utilised within surgery. s and full- text articles will be used and reviewed for relevance to the research question against an inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results The theories of innovative leadership in surgery are broad and non-specific. It demands a professionalism, competence, teamwork, and motivation. Upon comparison of the three country/region profiles there are strong similarities but present differences. It is paramount to understand and underpin these theories in order to foster the future of innovation in surgery. Surgery is fast evolving and developments in leadership must evolve with it. Within innovation, leadership skills must be harnessed including experience and observation. It is through an interprofessional team that surgeons must collaborate in order to provide optimum results and to permit the profession to evolve. Conclusions Innovation and surgery are symbiotic, and the next generation of surgical leaders must foster an environment where this is possible to cultivate. Programmes across these country profiles must ensure innovative leadership is present through good mentorship, coaching, team empowerment and feedback. Future directions must be put in place in post -graduate surgical training programmes to ensure that patient care is optimised as the primary objective.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
