Abstract

TAXONVolume 53, Issue 1 p. 203-205 Proposals to Conserve or RejectsFree Access (1613–1614) Proposals to reject the names Polypodiopsis and Polypodiopsis muelleri (Plantae vasculares, incertae sedis) Robert R. Mill, Corresponding Author Robert R. Mill r.mill@rbge.org.uk Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR Scotland, U .K.Search for more papers by this authorPeter Weston, Peter Weston Peter.Weston@rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, Mrs. Macquaries Road, New South Wales, Sydney, 2000 Australia.Search for more papers by this author Robert R. Mill, Corresponding Author Robert R. Mill r.mill@rbge.org.uk Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR Scotland, U .K.Search for more papers by this authorPeter Weston, Peter Weston Peter.Weston@rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, Mrs. Macquaries Road, New South Wales, Sydney, 2000 Australia.Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 February 2004 https://doi.org/10.2307/4135519Citations: 2AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume53, Issue1February 2004Pages 203-205 RelatedInformation

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call