161 ABLATION OF EPICARDIAL VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA ORIGINATING IN THE AREA OF PERICARDIAL ADHESIONS INDUCED BY STEREOTACTIC RADIOABLATION IN A PATIENT WITH ISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY

Abstract

Abstract This is the case of a 64-year-old male patient with prior inferior wall myocardial infarction, wearing a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator and suffering from recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). The patient had undergone a transitory successful endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in 2013 and a stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in 2021, targeting the VT originating in the inferior wall myocardial scar. The patient was referred to our institution due to recurrent highly symptomatic slow-VT. A coronary angiography ruled out coronary artery disease (CAD) progression and a RFCA was rescheduled. Given the suspected epicardial origin of VT based on a 12-lead ECG, the decision was made to perform a combined epi-endocardial ablation. SABR-induced pericardial adhesions prevented posterior pericardial access, thus requiring an anterior access approach (Figure 1, Panel A, yellow star). Following epicardial and endocardial electroanatomic mapping (EAM), VT ablation relied on a substrate-based approach. Local abnormal ventricular activities (LAVAs), detected both in the accessible epicardial inferior wall of the left ventricle and at the opposite endocardial site, were eliminated by radiofrequency (RF) current. Upon completion of endocardial ablation, ventricular pacing induced hemodynamically unstable VT, exiting from the epicardial region corresponding to the SABR-induced pericardial adhesions. Mechanical adhesiolysis, using the elbow of the open-irrigated ablation catheter, was performed to disrupt SABR-induced pericardial adhesions in the inferior wall. The epicardial EAM performed with the open-irrigated catheter recorded LAVAs in the infero-posterior wall of the left ventricle, corresponding to the SABR-disrupted pericardial adhesions. A RF current was delivered, targeting LAVAs at this site (Figure 1, Panel B: the central green dot corresponds to the area of disrupted pericardial adhesions). At the end of the procedure, no sustained VT was induced by programmed ventricular stimulation. Conclusion SABR constitutes a novel and promising non-invasive radioablative treatment of VT, potentially associated with cardiac toxicity. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of combined epicardial and endocardial RFCA of recurrent VT after SABR. Based on the first RFCA report and exclusion of CAD progression, we hypothesized that SABR might have favoured progression of the inferior low voltage area. With this case report, we would like to demonstrate that even if pericardial adhesions could be a consequence of SABR, gentle catheter-driven manoeuvres can be enough to disrupt the adhesions and to achieve full EAM. Further research is mandatory to shed light on SABR's long-term arrhythmogenic role.