Abstract
BackgroundWithin a sufficiently large bacterial population, some members will naturally adopt an alternate, metabolically-active state that favors small molecule synthesis over cell division. In Staphylococcus aureus this process can be sharply accelerated by multiple factors present during infection including nutrient limitation, host cationic peptide exposure and polymorphonuclear neutrophil internalization. These isogenic “tolerant” subpopulations have variable responses during antibiotic exposure and can remain viable in the presence of typically bactericidal concentrations. Survivors of antibiotic exposure can restart cell division upon cessation of antibiotics and cause relapse or recurrent infection. In this study we determine the ability of typical and atypical antistaphylococcal therapies to reduce the viability of tolerant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria.Methods S. aureus strain ATCC29213 as well as four clinical isolates (two MSSA, two MRSA) were selected for analysis. Overnight cultures were diluted in pre-warmed broth (MHB50) to 1×106 cfu/mL. Tolerance was induced by exposure to mupirocin (low [0.032 µg/mL] or high [3.2 µg/mL]) for 30 min. Tolerant cultures were exposed to vancomycin (35 µg/mL), cefazolin (25 µg/mL), daptomycin (7 µg/mL), telavancin (10 µg/mL), dalbavancin (6 µg/mL) or oritavancin (14 µg/mL) and viability was assessed by dilution plating at pre-defined time points (0, 2, 6, 24, 48 h). The minimum duration for 3-log viability reduction from baseline (MDK99.9) and culture viability at 48h were calculated independently for each of three biological replicates.ResultsThe rate of bacterial killing (MDK99.9) was reduced for all study antibiotics by the addition of mupirocin in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast to all other regimens, including lipoglycopeptide comparators, oritavancin was the only antimicrobial agent that maintained a similar extent of bacterial killing against tolerant staphylococci.ConclusionAntimicrobial tolerant staphylococci exhibit a decreased rate of killing by antistaphylococcal agents. However, oritavancin remained effective at maintaining a similar extent of killing. Further studies to investigate the role of otritavancin against recurrent or relapse staphylococcal infection is warranted.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.