Abstract
Augustine of Hippo is one of the few Latin sources for our knowledge of Manichaeism in late antiquity, and of all non-Manichaean authorities he is surely the most prolific. The author considers that van Oort is the only present-day scholar to have seriously taken up Beausobre's question-how much did Augustine actually know about Manichaeism, and when did he know it?-, but without really distinguishing between knowledge gained in his Manichaean period and knowledge obtained after it. He curtails the range of texts examined to his early writings, especially the two treatises De moribus. The issue of what knowledge about Manichaeism Augustine might have gained from his early contact with it must, it therefore seems to me, be couched in subtler terms having less to do with Manichaeism's writings than with its methods and practices.Keywords: Augustine; De moribus; Manichaeism
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.