15-month follow-up of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in octogenarians

Abstract

Abstract Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in octogenarians poses a challenge due to comorbidities, frailty, and suspected higher complication rates. Data regarding the outcome of catheter ablation in this population is scarce. Purpose Due to the projected increase of octogenarians presenting with AF in the future, we investigated the outcome of catheter ablation in this patient population. Methods We retrospectively analysed octogenarians with symptomatic AF undergoing catheter ablation in a single centre, including first and re-ablation procedures. Catheter ablation involved pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency (RF), cryoballoon (CB) and pulsed field ablation (PFA) as energy sources and also atrial tachycardia (AT) ablation including linear lesions and/or ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). Follow-up (FU) was obtained to assess arrhythmia-free survival after a 90-day blanking period, recurrences after the blanking period, management of recurrences, rhythm at FU, use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and improvement in symptoms (EHRA symptom scale). Results A total of 126 patients (mean age 82.2 ± 1.9 years, paroxysmal AF n=48, persistent AF n=78, mean CHA2DS2-VASc-Score 4.2 ± 1.5) were included. 57.1% (n=72/126) underwent an index procedure {47.2% (n=34/72) RF PVI, 37.5% (n=27/72) CB PVI, 4.2% (n=3/72) PFA PVI and 11.1% (n=8/72) PVI + AT ablation}. 42.9% (n=54/126) received repeat procedures {20.4% (n=11/54) re-PVI, 42.6% (n=23/54) re-PVI + AT ablation, 37% (n=20/54) AT ablation}. FU of 108 patients after 15.4 ± 3.6 months revealed arrhythmia-free survival after the blanking period in 64.8% (n=70/108). Recurrence after the blanking period was seen in 35.2% (n=38/108). No significant difference in recurrences was shown between index and repeat procedures (32.3%, n=20/62 after index procedures and 36.7%, n=18/49 after repeat procedures, p =0.97). Management of recurrence involved repeat ablation (47%, n=18/38), AADs (16%, n=6/38), cardioversion (21%, n=8/38), pacemaker-implantation/AV-node ablation (5%, n=2/38) and pharmacological rate control (11%, n=4/38). At FU, 88.9% (n=96/108) of patients were in sinus rhythm with 21.3% (n=23/108) receiving AADs, 7.4% (n=8/108) were in AF, 0.9% (n=1/108) in AT and 2.8% (n=3/108) pacemaker-dependant. Symptoms were significantly improved at FU (mean EHRA score at FU= 1.2 ± 0.5, before ablation= 2.4 ± 0.5, p <0.0001). Conclusion Catheter ablation for AF in octogenarians is effective in maintaining sinus rhythm and controlling AF-related symptoms. Longer term success and impact on prognosis in this patient population is unknown and should be investigated further.