Abstract
Abstract Background Advances in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have improved graft patency and survival. Our prior work suggested a reduction in deep and organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) with single versus bilateral internal mammary arteries and a skeletonized approach. Even for the same number of arterial grafts used, specific artery type may impact SSI incidence. We aim to assess the effect of potentially modifiable risk factors on post-CABG deep and organ/space SSI, including number and type of vessel grafts, and closure method. Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of post-CABG surgery patients from 01/01/19-12/31/22. SSIs were identified during routine surveillance using National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. Data on demographics, comorbidities, surgical technique and surgeon were obtained from hospital and cardiac surgery databases. A sub-analysis evaluated the risk of SSI in patients with two arterial grafts by type of artery used, specifically bilateral internal mammary (BIMA) graft versus single internal mammary artery plus radial graft (SIMA-R). We performed univariate analyses to determine association of risk factors with SSI. Results Of the 2050 included patients, 23 developed an SSI . In univariate analyses, diabetes mellitus (OR 5.6, p < 0.001) and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus surgical adhesive (OR 19.82, p< 0.001) were associated with SSI. There was no significant association between SSI and the total number of arteries or combination of vessel grafts used. In the sub-analysis, 281 patients underwent SIMA-R and 154 underwent BIMA. None of the SIMA-R, versus 4 of the BIMA developed SSI (p=0.02). There were other differences between the groups, including a greater proportion with a skeletonized (versus pedicled) arterial harvest (OR 2.19, p=0.003) and longer case duration (238 vs 217 minutes, p=0.003) in the BIMA group, which could confound this relationship. Conclusion In the overall cohort, NPWT was associated with SSI on univariate analysis, though notably this closure method is often used in patients with higher pre-operative risk. Amongst those patients who received two arterial grafts, there was a reduced SSI risk with SIMA-R approach. Future studies should explore the impacts of graft choice and wound care. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.