Abstract
BackgroundShort lapses in adherence to ARVs can lead to virologic failure and emergence of resistance. Previous in vitro studies of regimen “forgiveness” simulated drug exposures of perfect adherence or short-term suboptimal adherence with bictegravir+emtricitabine+tenofovir alafenamide (BIC+FTC+TAF) and with dolutegravir and lamivudine (DTG+3TC). Here, viral breakthrough (VB) and resistance development were evaluated under alternating high and low drug exposures simulating variable adherence levels.MethodsWild-type HIV-1 (IIIb)-infected MT-2 cells were exposed to drug combinations and monitored for VB. Experiments alternated between high and low drug concentrations of either BIC+FTC+TAF or DTG+3TC (Table 1). Drug concentrations for each regimen were determined using human plasma-free adjusted clinical trough concentrations (Cmin), at simulated Cmin after missing 2 or 4 consecutive doses (Cmin-2 and Cmin-4) based on drug half-lives. Emergent HIV-1 were genotyped by deep sequencing and a 2% threshold.ResultsIn these experiments, constant drug concentrations corresponding to full adherence (Cmin) did not lead to VB. Using Cmin concentrations for one week followed by constant Cmin-2 exposures for 4 weeks, DTG+3TC had VB and emergence of M184V/I in reverse transcriptase (RT) but there was no VB for BIC+FTC+TAF. Using alternating drug exposures of Cmin (weeks 1 and 3) and Cmin-2 or Cmin -4 (weeks 2, 4, and 5), VB was not observed with BIC+FTC+TAF, and VB was decreased or delayed with DTG+3TC compared to DTG+3TC held at Cmin-2 or Cmin-4. Resistance development was observed in some cultures with VB: 1 culture with BIC+FTC+TAF had G163R in IN and 19 cultures with DTG+3TC had INSTI and RT resistance including 10 with M184V/I.Table 1. Summary of Breakthrough Frequency and Resistance Development ConclusionBIC+FTC+TAF has high in vitro forgiveness and consistent protection against emergence of drug resistance during simulations of short lapses in adherence. Higher DTG+3TC exposure, whether constant or intermittent, was better at preventing or delaying VB than lower DTG+3TC exposures, but DTG+3TC was less forgiving than BIC+FTC+TAF. Prevention of viral replication and resistance development is necessary to maintain lifelong viral suppression, particularly in the real world where drug adherence is often imperfect.DisclosuresAndrew Mulato, BS, MBA, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Rima K. Acosta, BS, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Stephen R. Yant, PhD, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Tomas Cihlar, PhD, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Kirsten L. White, PhD, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.