143 Validation Strategies of Sensor Data in the Context of Heat Stress Detection

Abstract

Abstract Evaluating genetically heat stress (HS) of cattle is still a major challenge, also because of the need to have access to HS sensitive phenotypes relating their reaction to temperature and humidity as described by the temperature-humidity index (THI). A solution could be to add the information of data from sensors. However, activity (ACT) and rumination (RUM) sensors reflect no “production” [i.e., milk yields (MY), milk composition, but also intake or growth] related aspects which is suboptimal. Therefore, the objectives of this study were thus to assess the possible usefulness for adding sensors data for HS genetic evaluation based on a dairy situation. But the context described can be easily enlarged and include beef cattle and pigs. Strategy was illustrated using daily SenseHub collar records that were obtained from October 2019 to July 2022 in six dairy herds in Wallonia in Southern Belgium. A total of 453 Walloon Holstein cows were followed during this period for activity time. Meteorological data and a HS sensitive “production” trait (here MY) were also obtained from 2015 to 2022 for 1,740 cows from the same herds. In total 32,154 MY, 130,867 ACT and 130,848 RUM records were available. The thresholds at which the different traits start to be affected by HS were estimated at a THI of 63, 64 and 66, respectively, for MY, ACT and RUM. A three-trait random regression reaction norm model was fitted with these different thresholds. Estimated heritability values were 0.19 ± 0.03, 0.14 ± 0.06 and 0.21 ± 0.05 respectively for MY, ACT and RUM using AIREML. Ratios of variance associated to THI and constant genetic effect were 0.002, 0.02 and 0.04 indicating a stronger reaction by RUM but also ACT than MY to THI. However, it is uncertain if the reactions of these sensor traits are reflected in the production traits. Estimated genetic correlations of regressions on THI for ACT and RUM showed values of 0.51 ± 0.70 and 0.08 ± 0.54 with MY and 0.77 ± 0.69 between ACT and RUM. The first eigenvector of the correlation matrix explained 65% of the total variability and standardized coefficients of this eigenvector were 0.42, 0.69 and 0.59 for MY, ACT and RUM. A total of 50% of the variance associated with the regression on THI for MY could be explained by the regressions on THI for ACT and RUM. Adding the constant genetic effects for ACT and RUM only marginally increased to 51% the ability to explain the effect of THI on MY. Based on these results, reactions of different indicator traits, here sensor data, may reflect a different reaction than production and therefore economically important traits. Additional research, also beyond dairy cattle, should continue to address this topic that is very important for the validation of sensor data detecting HS.